Supreme Court On Judges: The Supreme Court on Thursday (December 12, 2024) mentioned that there is no such thing as a place for pretentiousness amongst judges. The courtroom suggested folks becoming a member of judicial service to keep away from utilizing social media.
While listening to the suo motu case in opposition to the choice of Madhya Pradesh High Court to dismiss two ladies judicial officers, Justice B.V. The bench headed by Nagarathna discovered a Facebook put up of one of many two officers, wherein he had shared his experiences of the courts on Facebook.
What did the Supreme Court say?
The bench mentioned, “A judge has to live like a monk and work like a horse. A judicial officer has to make a lot of sacrifices. There is no room for ostentation for a judge.” The bench additional mentioned, “Judges should not comment on the judgments because platforms like Facebook are open forums. Tomorrow it can be said that on social media they have given their view in one way or the other on a case.”
What is the matter?
Justice N Kotishwar Singh was additionally included within the bench. The case pertains to the dismissal of two civil judges Aditi Kumar Sharma and Sarita Chaudhary, who have been inducted into the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service in 2018 and 2017 respectively.
A complete of six ladies judicial officers have been dismissed in 2023. When the Supreme Court requested the High Court to rethink its determination, the Madhya Pradesh High Court withdrew its determination in respect of 4 officers, however refused to withdraw the dismissal order in opposition to these two officers and Adverse feedback have been recorded in opposition to him, which have been positioned in a sealed cowl earlier than the Supreme Court.
Senior advocate and former High Court judge R. Basant supported this view and mentioned that a judge should be ready to avoid social media and those that usually are not ready to take action should not be a part of the judicial service.
Read this additionally: ‘…and you did not even hassle to come back, what is that this?’, SC classifies Centre’s lawyer in full courtroom