Bid to double global protected areas may affect India’s tribes

- Advertisement -

The growing privatisation of the protected areas within the identify of ecotourism and sustainable ecotourism was probably the most severe rising problem to the existence of the indigenous communities. Image exhibits tribal girls from Kotia village within the Andhra-Odisha border area.
| Photo Credit: The Hindu

GUWAHATI

The bid to safeguard biodiversity by nearly doubling protected areas throughout the globe will hit India’s tribal inhabitants the toughest, warned specialists at a symposium on the rights of indigenous communities organised by the University of Arizona within the United States on March 22.

Indigenous peoples the world over will endure if the U.N.’s Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework pursues and achieves its goal of accelerating protected areas from the present 16% to 30% of the world’s terrestrial space.

Also learn | Fight against bauxite mining in Odisha: the view from the hill

The Scheduled Tribes in India will bear the brunt of this growth, as 89 of the 106 notified nationwide parks within the nation have been established in areas that they lived. This signifies that 84% of protected areas in India overlap with tribal areas, New Delhi-based rights activist Suhas Chakma mentioned on the symposium on ‘Conservation, Racism, and Indigenous Peoples’ Human Rights’.

Decoding the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework | In Focus podcast

Disproportionate impression

Of the remaining 17 nationwide parks, South Button Island National Park and Rani Jhansi Marine National Park – each within the Andaman and Nicobar Islands – are in marine areas, and should not have any human habitation. Four others (Van Vihar, Kasu Brahmananda Reddy, Mahaveer Harina Vanasthali, and Salim Ali) are zoos, whereas 4 others (Col. Sherjung Simbalbara, Neora Valley, Singalila, and Fossil) even have some tribal populations. On the opposite hand, individuals belonging to the final class have solely been affected by seven nationwide parks, Mr. Chakma mentioned.

“That the STs who constitute about 8.6% of the total population of India also account for 84% of the communities impacted by the protected areas, reflects the disproportionate targeting of indigenous peoples for saving the world’s biodiversity and ecosystem. Worse, their lifestyles and livelihood practices have been criminalised from the colonial times with legislations such as the Forest Act of 1927,” mentioned Mr. Chakma, the regional marketing campaign supervisor of a global initiative on indigenous peoples affected by protected areas.

No-win state of affairs

Such criminalisation was evident from the withdrawal of greater than 48,000 instances in opposition to tribal individuals relating to excise (making nation liquor), forest offence, and land encroachment by the Odisha authorities in February, he added.

“The current expansion of protected areas such as Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary in Rajasthan or Nauradehi Sanctuary in Madhya Pradesh mainly impact the STs and other forest dwellers,” mentioned Mr. Chakma. “Assam’s notification for the Barak Bhuban Wildlife Sanctuary on June 19, 2022 states that the area is free from encroachment and there are no rights and concessions of any person in the area. But the indigenous Khasi people living inside the proposed sanctuary have records of inhabiting the area since 1914,” he added.

“If indigenous peoples win the right to stay inside the protected areas, they live with restricted freedom of movement, little or no access to development initiatives, excessive surveillance, sexual violence, and criminal cases for forest offences, poaching, etc. If they accept relocation, the world simply has not seen a single successful case of rehabilitation and resettlement,” Mr. Chakma mentioned.

Human rights violations

Participants on the symposium identified that, throughout Asia, indigenous peoples face huge human rights violations in protected areas. In the Ujungkulon National Park of Indonesia, indigenous peoples are denied the correct to correct housing, well being, training, electrical energy, and safety. In Cambodia, indigenous chief Heng Saphen, dwelling contained in the Beng Per Wildlife Sanctuary, was convicted by a kangaroo court docket for cultivating on her personal land.

The symposium additionally took notice of Cambodia’s Botum Sakor National Park, whose forest cowl was decreased to 18% due to logging by July 2023, two years after the park was handed over to a non-public funding agency.

Performing for vacationers

The growing privatisation of the protected areas within the identify of ecotourism and sustainable ecotourism was probably the most severe rising problem to the existence of the indigenous communities, it was underlined on the symposium.

“The indigenous peoples at expensive ecotourism spots have been reduced to sitting in traditional replicas of their homes in traditional attires and ornaments, playing musical instruments, and at times, performing traditional music and dances until the tourists depart. More often than not, indigenous peoples are projected like animals in a zoo in many of the ecotourism spots,” Mr. Chakma mentioned.

Source link

- Advertisement -

Related Articles