The decide presiding over Donald Trump’s federal election interference case has reinstated a gag order on the previous president.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
cover caption
toggle caption
Alex Wong/Getty Images
The decide presiding over Donald Trump’s federal election interference case has reinstated a gag order on the previous president.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
The decide presiding over Donald Trump’s federal election interference case has reinstated a gag order on the previous president.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan imposed the restrictions on Trump two weeks in the past, barring him from making public statements concentrating on prosecutors, court docket workers and certain witnesses. Trump appealed, and requested that the gag be lifted as that attraction performs out in the courts.
Chutkan quickly paused the restrictions to let the 2 sides temporary her on their extra arguments. In her ruling, the decide mentioned Trump is unlikely to win his attraction on the deserves, and that the restrictions are mandatory to guard the administration of justice.
“The First Amendment rights of participants in criminal proceedings must yield, when necessary, to the orderly administration of justice,” the decide mentioned in her order. “And contrary to Defendant’s argument, the right to a fair trial is not his alone, but belongs also to the government and the public.”
Trump, she mentioned, fails to acknowledge proof offered by the federal government that when the previous president publicly attacked people, together with on points associated to this case, these people have confronted threats and harassment.
“The evidence is in the record,” Chutkan wrote. “Defendant fails to acknowledge it.”
The decide additionally rejected Trump’s argument that the gag order is unconstitutionally imprecise, together with its use of the time period “targeting.”
Chutkan pointed to 2 of Trump’s social media posts for example the form of statements which can be allowed and people who her order bars.
In the primary one, made when the gag was in place, Trump asserts his innocence, claims his prosecution is politically motivated and accuses the Biden administration of being corrupt. Those statements, Chutkan writes, don’t violate her order “targeting” sure people.
In the second, posted when the restrictions have been lifted, Trump lashes out at his final chief of workers, Mark Meadows, following a report that Meadows was granted immunity to testify earlier than the grand jury.
This submit, Chutkan says, “would almost certainly” violate the gag order as a result of it “singles out a foreseeable witness for purposes of characterizing his potentially unfavorable testimony as a ‘lie.'”
Trump’s submit “could readily be interpreted as an attempt to influence o prevent the witness’s participation in this case,” the order says.