Editor’s Note: Douglas London is the writer of “The Recruiter: Spying and the Lost Art of American Intelligence.” He teaches intelligence research at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service and is a nonresident scholar at the Middle East Institute. London served in the CIA’s Clandestine Service for over 34 years, largely in the Middle East, South and Central Asia and Africa, together with three assignments as a Chief of Station. Follow him on Twitter @DouglasLondon5. The opinions expressed on this commentary are his personal. View extra opinion at CNN.
CNN
—
Has Vladimir Putin gone mad? How else may the Russian President have so recklessly positioned the world on the precipice of the unthinkable, with what exterior the Kremlin is seen as an unjustified and unwinnable struggle in Ukraine?
Yes, unwinnable, in that even ought to Russian troops substitute Ukraine’s democratic authorities at bayonet level with a Russian puppet and occupy the nation, the Kremlin faces a bloody insurgency and crushing financial penalties.
Putin may but understand his best worry of a grassroots motion that deposes him – and it may come from what he has set in movement with his personal hand. But, as a longtime watcher of Russia, I doubt Putin has misplaced his thoughts, however moderately, is so ailing knowledgeable as to be basing his calculus on intelligence that bears little resemblance to actuality.
The warning voiced by many, together with Gabriel Garcia Marquez, that “it is easier to start a war than to end it” mustn’t have been misplaced on Putin.
He is a pupil of historical past, warped as his understanding of the previous is likely to be. If it’s Putin’s notion of Russia’s humiliations that’s driving him to rewrite historical past, that motivation may really be much less compelled by ego and extra by his sensible concern about the existential risk he believes will destroy him if left unchecked.
Putin couldn’t maintain energy, nor his allegedly ill-gotten riches, in a genuinely democratic Russian state. Well prematurely of briefly leaving the presidency in 2008, turning over the submit to de facto caretaker and titular head Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian chief made his intentions clear.
In 2005, Putin declared in his annual state of the union deal with to parliament that the collapse of the Soviet empire “was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century” and was an “epidemic” fostering separatist actions that had “spilled over to Russia itself.”
His December 2021 feedback on historic Russia’s demise had been the pure follow-up to his March 2018 assertion to reporters that he would reverse the Soviet Union’s collapse, if he may.
Putin, previously of the KGB, is a educated intelligence officer. He is obsessed with management. An intelligence officer strives to ascertain energy over everybody and all the things, together with the narratives by which they’re perceived, in order to manage the ensuing actions of others.
There is far theater to this commerce, as mirrored in Putin’s fiery speeches and the public portrayal of his virility, the absolute subordination of Russia’s most senior officers and the nation’s feeding a mystique of overwhelming navy energy.
Putin’s theatrical path of inserting Russian nuclear forces on alert was geared toward home audiences – his, and people in the West. It was choreographed to impress a reciprocal response and help his narrative.
Russia, he contends, is the sufferer of an aggressor’s assault, and placing first, and strongest, is an act of preemption and self-defense. If it was designed to push again in opposition to a reputable US navy risk, he needn’t have made the order public.
Were Russian forces placed on such alert, US intelligence businesses would have instantly detected indications. When the US positioned its personal nuclear forces on alert in response to Russian navy actions throughout the 1973 Arab-Israeli struggle, the Nixon White House made no public announcement. But the US did intentionally relay orders throughout its navy and safety construction in the open in order that Russia’s management would shortly get the message.
Putin’s is an activist philosophy that seeks to go away nothing to likelihood and seizes the initiative in order to power his foes to react to circumstances he goals to dictate. But all of that relies on good intelligence. You construct a home of playing cards when a plan is constructed with out consciousness of its potential flaws and vulnerabilities.
While it’s too early to evaluate how issues will end up in the finish in Ukraine, there’s little debate that Putin’s struggle has not gone the means he could have anticipated, or in addition to he would have appreciated.
No one can learn Putin’s thoughts, however the slender prism we’re allowed paints the image of a frontrunner who has created a royal court docket of sycophants unwilling to offer information he doesn’t need to entertain. He has stuffed the nation’s key posts with siloviki, highly effective politicians with backgrounds in Russia’s intelligence companies, largely the former KGB.
But there’s no honor amongst thieves, or on this case, the former spies whom Putin depends on, owing to confidence in his skill to govern and management them. They are indulged to plunder the nation’s assets and swell their wallets with incentives to safe loyalty, moderately than intrinsic belief.
Putin’s current and probably staged nationwide safety council meeting, doubtless scripted, taped and maybe edited because it was, supplied a revealing glimpse. And bureaucracies, which Putin’s intelligence, safety and protection businesses finally are, replicate the path and instance of their very own leaders.
Seemingly paranoid over his personal safety, it’s evident Putin’s self-isolation and mercurial method has fostered a level of self-censorship and spin throughout these on whom he relies upon to offer an correct depiction of the world exterior.
In this ambiance, how clear would Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Chief of Army Staff Valery Gerasimov be regarding the armed forces’ fight and logistical capabilities? If the Russian losses are even a fraction of that being depicted in the media, it will nonetheless be on a tempo severalfold of that the US incurred over 20 years in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.
Little is heard publicly from Russian Main Intelligence Directorate Chief (GRU) Admiral Igor Olegovich Kostyukov. A famous hardliner who ostensibly shares Putin’s imaginative and prescient and whose group, particularly Unit 29155, has been linked to assassinations, sabotage and help to insurgencies abroad, he is likely to be heard from even much less.
If Russia’s technique in the first days of the struggle mirrored GRU assessments suggesting the Russian military would sweep throughout Ukraine with little resistance from an detached, if not sympathetic, pro-Russia inhabitants, Kostyukov’s star could possibly be on the decline.
Having watched the Director of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), Sergey Naryshkin, and his Federal Security Service (FSB) counterpart Alexander Bortnikov, cower and fumble in Putin’s presence on tv, I feel it’s unlikely they might have cautioned him over the Ukrainian resolve to battle and the doubtlessly crushing financial response of the world’s strongest liberal democracies.
As the world breathlessly watches, Putin’s actions are undermining assumptions that lengthy outlined nice energy competitors. “Mutual Assured Destruction,” for instance, may no longer supply the dependable guardrail as soon as thought.
Putin publicly endorsed a revised Russian nuclear deterrent coverage that permits him to make use of atomic weapons in response to a standard strike focusing on the nation’s crucial authorities and navy infrastructure. And Belarus simply introduced a referendum altering its regulation to permit the nation to host nuclear weapons, a possible precursor to Putin’s deployment of cellular, intermediate vary nuclear missiles nearer to NATO borders.
Notwithstanding my attainable bias as a 34-year CIA Clandestine Service veteran who lengthy pursued the Russian goal, higher perception into Putin’s aspirations, intentions and the intelligence upon which he’s making choices will rely extra on folks than on our vaunted technological prowess.
High decision spy satellites allow us to rely the Russian troops, see their formations and assess their weaponry. And listening posts monitor the quantity of communication, and maybe even a few of its content material.
But expertise can not reply the most vital questions for Ukraine. What is Vladimir Putin pondering? His intent? His endgame? And how can we assist the public discern reality from disinformation on the floor?
Some of what perception the US and its allies had into the Kremlin’s pondering reportedly was misplaced when a CIA agent with entry to Putin was endangered by a leak 5 years in the past. The compromise was former President Donald Trump’s, who mentioned labeled info in a May 2017 Oval workplace assembly with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak.
Addressing such gaps, CIA Director William Burns declared his commitment to realign the company from counterterrorism to conventional intelligence assortment in opposition to strategic adversaries. His acknowledged priorities have been China, expertise, Russia and strengthening the company’s workforce.
The CIA has its work minimize out for it in overcoming the final 20 years of underinvestment in conventional overseas espionage in a a lot harder atmosphere than James Bond ever confronted, and nurturing well-placed brokers takes time. Despite former President Trump’s private sentiments, although, I count on the CIA by no means actually stopped working Russia.
Russia’s preliminary, relative restraint in guarding in opposition to civilian casualties was actually predicated on the problems Putin hoped to keep away from in ruling Ukraine and suppressing an insurgency after seizing the capital and changing its authorities. But he’ll doubtless develop determined to reestablish management and obtain navy victory.
Justifiably involved at how the extended conflagration and ensuing Russian casualties will play at dwelling, Putin may more and more apply the brutal techniques seen in the Syria struggle by levelling city facilities and wielding thermobaric weapons and cluster munitions in indiscriminate focusing on.
Countering Putin and his siloviki requires understanding them with intelligence from insiders and resistance to an emotional element that implies recklessness on the Russian chief’s half.
It’s brutal, illogical to us, and due to this fact unpredictable. But US intelligence succeeded in anticipating his transfer on Ukraine not by judging Putin irrational, however moderately, by inspecting his calculus, ill-informed because it has been, and the circle of advisers, incapable as they appear to be, on which he’s relying to make his choices.
Putin is more likely to proceed to escalate his struggle in Ukraine, fearing most of all that he may lose management of Russia. Whether he actually understands that the struggle itself places him in danger is an all-important query.