Vodafone Arbitration case: Centre will challenge Voda arbitral award | India Business News – Newz9

NEW DELHI: Armed with an opinion from solicitor basic Tushar Mehta that an arbitral tribunal can not render a regulation handed by a sovereign Parliament ineffective, the Centre will quickly challenge the Permanent Court of Arbitration award, which quashed the earnings tax division’s demand of Rs 22,000 crore as tax, penalty and curiosity on Vodafone on the bottom that India violated the bilateral funding treaty with the Netherlands by retrospectively amending the regulation.
“The question of law — the power of an arbitral tribunal to virtually and substantially declare a parliamentary legislation of a competent Parliament of a sovereign nation to be non est and unenforceable — itself is an issue which needs to be challenged. I therefore, opine that the Union of India must challenge the said award and must file all available proceedings to challenge the award and/or to protect the interest of Union of India,” Mehta stated in his opinion.

Mehta stated India ought to discover a reliable discussion board in Singapore and suggested towards approaching the Delhi excessive courtroom or the Supreme Court. “From the award, it appears that the seat of arbitration is Singapore and prime facie the challenge may lie in the said arbitration before the municipal courts of Singapore,” the SG instructed.
Two months after Vodafone received the taxation dispute within the SC in January 2012, the Centre had amended the tax legal guidelines retrospectively and, in 2013, it slapped the telecom big with a tax demand of Rs 13,000 crore.
Sources stated India has to maneuver quick to challenge the award in an acceptable discussion board conserving in thoughts the interval of limitation that will be connected to the award. The SG instructed that the longer term plan of action be charted in session with lawyer basic Ok Ok Venugopal.
When the regulation ministry referred the SG’s opinion to the AG and sought his view, Venugopal recused from the method saying he was “prohibited from advising the government in this case by the rules of conflict of interest”.
The AG, in his letter to the regulation ministry, stated, “I was consulted by Vodafone International Holdings BV in regard to the same dispute much before I was appointed to the office of attorney general for India. My office records reveal that I had received a special retainer from the said company in April 2012 in relation to the very dispute.”
He stated he had additionally suggested the corporate via three extra conferences for which he was paid moreover. “In the circumstances, therefore, I must express my inability to be involved in the case in any manner,” the AG stated.