White Sox discover yet another way to lose a game: Infield fly rule interference

- Advertisement -

The Chicago White Sox, house owners of MLB’s worst report, innovated on the science of shedding yet once more on Thursday. Though to be honest, that they had some assist from the umpires.

Down 8-6 towards the Baltimore Orioles, Chicago had a probability to win it within the backside of the ninth inning when Andrew Benintendi got here to the plate with two runners on base and one out. Orioles nearer Craig Kimbrel managed to get him to hit a pop-up with a excessive fastball.

Benintendi was out earlier than the ball landed in shortstop Gunnar Henderson’s glove through the infield fly rule, which ought to have been the second out for the White Sox. It wound up being the third as properly, when baserunner Andrew Vaughn was known as out for interference.

Interference, on an infield fly.

Both White Sox supervisor Pedro Grifol and the White Sox broadcasters had some harsh phrases for the choice:

Replay did not actually assist clarify what the umpire noticed. Vaughn could be seen wanting up on the pop fly and slowly shuffling again to second base, together with his again turned to Henderson the whole time. Henderson has to take a step to the proper to keep away from working into an unaware Vaughn, however nonetheless reaches the ball’s vacation spot with a number of seconds to spare.

Vaughn was confused after the sport:

“So I was reading the play. Saw the pop-up. Knew it was an infield fly. Read it and started to shuffle back and then he kind of breezed by me on the right side. He went and made the play, and then the umpire called me out.

“I did not really feel like he was deterred from making the play. It was a excessive pop-up, we had been all studying it … My again’s turned to the shortstop, I do not know the place he is at.”

CHICAGO, IL - MAY 23: Pedro Grifol (5) of the Chicago White Sox argues with the umpires after a pop out by Andrew Benintendi (23) of the Chicago White Sox is called an unassisted double play after interference by Andrew Vaughn (25) of the Chicago White Sox after a game against the Baltimore Orioles on May 23, 2024 at Guaranteed Rate Field in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Melissa Tamez/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

White Sox manager Pedro Grifol needed an explanation from the umpires on this one. (Photo by Melissa Tamez/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

By the most strict letter of the law, the play could be seen as interfering with a fielder, as an infield fly is not a dead ball.

From the MLB rulebook:

“Rule 6.01(a) Penalty for Interference Comment: A runner who’s adjudged to have hindered a fielder who’s trying to make a play on a batted ball is out whether or not it was intentional or not.”

And later:

“[An infield fly] is alive and runners could advance on the threat of the ball being caught, or retouch and advance after the ball is touched, the identical as on any fly ball. If the hit turns into a foul ball, it’s handled the identical as any foul.”

However they obtained there, it is another loss for the White Sox, who now sit at 15-36 in a season with few expectations.

Source link

- Advertisement -

Related Articles