Attorney John Eastman confronted disciplinary costs from the California State Bar for his position in Donald Trump’s authorized effort to stay in energy after shedding the 2020 presidential election.
Jae C. Hong/AP
cover caption
toggle caption
Jae C. Hong/AP
Attorney John Eastman confronted disciplinary costs from the California State Bar for his position in Donald Trump’s authorized effort to stay in energy after shedding the 2020 presidential election.
Jae C. Hong/AP
A California judge has formally beneficial that attorney John Eastman lose his regulation license for his position in Donald Trump’s authorized effort to stay in energy after shedding the 2020 presidential election.
Eastman, a outstanding determine in conservative authorized circles and a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, performed a key position in growing and backing a plan for states to ship pro-Trump slates of electors to Congress and have then-Vice President Mike Pence unilaterally block or delay the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory.
“Eastman’s wrongdoing constitutes exceptionally serious ethical violations warranting severe professional discipline,” wrote California State Bar Court Judge Yvette Roland in her decision. “Eastman made multiple patently false and misleading statements in court filings, in public remarks heard by countless Americans and to others regarding the conduct of the 2020 presidential election and Vice President Pence’s authority to refuse to count or delay counting properly certified slates of electoral votes on January 6, 2021.”
Judge Roland additionally criticized Eastman’s defiant response to the allegations in opposition to him.
“His lack of insight into the wrongfulness of his misconduct is deeply troubling,” wrote Judge Roland. “While Eastman is entitled to defend himself, his conduct goes beyond this, revealing a complete failure to understand the wrongfulness of his actions.”
In addition to disbarment, Judge Roland beneficial that Eastman pay $10,000 in fines.
Judge Roland’s advice might be reviewed by the California Supreme Court, which can in the end determine whether or not he can retain his regulation license. Eastman has additionally instructed that he would attraction. In the meantime, Judge Roland’s choice locations Eastman’s license on “involuntary inactive” standing, which can successfully prohibit Eastman from training regulation.
In its case in opposition to Eastman, the State Bar of California had argued that Eastman “misused his license in a grave and injurious manner designed to undermine our democracy, subvert the peaceful transfer of presidential power, and thwart the will of the people in a free and fair election. In doing so, he betrayed the fundamental duties and oaths he swore to uphold.”
Eastman denied all wrongdoing, insisting that he was merely zealously advocating for his shopper, Trump, and that his authorized arguments had been affordable and up for debate. In California State Bar Court, Eastman testified in his personal protection and continued to advance claims that the 2020 election was marred by widespread illegality. In current media appearances, he has additionally cited broadly debunked claims about election fraud, such because the pro-Trump movie “2,000 Mules.”
In courtroom, the California State Bar rebutted Eastman’s claims with proof and testimony from state election officers. Eastman, for his half, testified that he had not taken steps to independently confirm a number of claims of election fraud that he had superior in authorized proceedings.
One of a number of Trump attorneys underneath scrutiny
Eastman is one of a number of attorneys who superior the Trump marketing campaign’s 2020 election efforts and who’ve since confronted disciplinary motion from authorized authorities, together with Rudy Giuliani, Jeffrey Clark, Jenna Ellis and Sidney Powell.
Eastman additionally faces state legal costs in Fulton County, Ga., for his position within the Trump marketing campaign’s authorized effort to overturn the 2020 election. He has pleaded not responsible. Special Counsel Jack Smith has additionally ordered transcripts of Eastman’s testimony in California State Bar Court, suggesting Eastman is underneath federal scrutiny as nicely, as first reported by Politico.
Prior to becoming a member of the Trump authorized crew, Eastman served as dean of the Chapman University regulation college and unsuccessfully campaigned to change into California Attorney General in 2010.
After the 2020 election, Eastman joined Trump’s authorized effort to overturn the election outcomes and superior claims of fraud that had been persistently rejected by courts. Eastman then authored memos describing a plan, underneath which Pence would block the certification of Biden’s electoral faculty victory in Congress.
On the morning of Jan. 6, 2021, Eastman took the stage together with Rudy Giuliani on the pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” rally on the Ellipse close to the White House and claimed that the election had been tainted by “fraud.” During his speech to the gang, Eastman acknowledged – with none proof – that computer systems that tabulated vote totals had a “secret folder” that was used to falsify the outcomes, and pressured Pence to behave.
Despite the strain marketing campaign from Trump, Eastman and others, Pence in the end rejected the plan as unconstitutional.
A mob of Trump supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol, injuring 140 law enforcement officials, forcing lawmakers and their employees to evacuate or barricade themselves in hiding locations, and delaying the certification of the electoral faculty vote.
“Thanks to your bull
“The ‘siege’ is because YOU and your boss did not do what was necessary to allow this to be aired in a public way so the American people can see for themselves what happened,” Eastman replied.
Despite the assault, Eastman continued to advocate for Pence to dam the certification of Biden’s victory.
Days later, Eastman sought to protect himself from potential authorized fallout related to the assault on the Capitol.
“I’ve decided that I should be on the pardon list if that is still in the works,” Eastman wrote in an e mail to Rudy Giuliani on Jan. 11, 2021.
Eastman has described the authorized scrutiny from the State Bar of California as politically motivated. “This is authoritarianism, not republicanism,” his attorneys wrote of their closing arguments.
