California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks in help of Proposition 1, a $6.38 billion bond poll measure, throughout a information convention at the Los Angeles General Medical Center in Los Angeles, Wednesday, Jan. 3, 2024.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
disguise caption
toggle caption
Damian Dovarganes/AP
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks in help of Proposition 1, a $6.38 billion bond poll measure, throughout a information convention at the Los Angeles General Medical Center in Los Angeles, Wednesday, Jan. 3, 2024.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California voters have accepted a measure that can impose strict necessities on counties to spend on housing and drug therapy packages to tackle the state’s homelessness crisis, in a tissue-thin win for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who personally campaigned for the measure’s passage.
Democrats outnumber Republicans by a staggering 2-to-1 in California, and the borderline vote — coming greater than two weeks after election day — signaled unease with the state’s homeless insurance policies after Newsom’s administration invested billions of {dollars} to get folks off the road however no dramatic change has been seen in Los Angeles and different massive cities.
The state accounts for almost a 3rd of the homeless inhabitants in the United States; roughly 181,000 Californians are in want of housing.
Newsom, who made the measure a signature proposal, spent important money and time campaigning on its behalf. He raised greater than $13 million to market it with the help of regulation enforcement, first responders, hospitals and mayors of main cities. Opponents raised simply $1,000.
Proposition 1 marks the first replace to the state’s psychological well being system in 20 years.
“This is the biggest change in decades in how California tackles homelessness, and a victory for doing things radically different,” Newsom stated in an announcement after the borderline vote. “Now, counties and local officials must match the ambition of California voters. This historic reform will only succeed if we all kick into action immediately – state government and local leaders, together.”
Counties will now be required to spend about two-thirds of the cash from a voter-approved tax enacted in 2004 on millionaires for psychological well being companies on housing and packages for homeless folks with critical psychological sicknesses or substance abuse issues.
The state, with a present stock of 5,500 beds, wants some 8,000 extra models to deal with psychological well being and dependancy points.
The initiative additionally permits the state to borrow $6.38 billion to construct 4,350 housing models, half of which shall be reserved for veterans, and add 6,800 psychological well being and dependancy therapy beds.
Opponents, together with social service suppliers and county officers, stated the change will threaten packages that aren’t solely centered on housing or drug therapy however hold folks from turning into homeless in the first place.
Critics stated the single formulation might imply rural counties similar to Butte, with a homeless inhabitants of fewer than 1,300 folks, can be required to divert the similar share of funds to housing as city counties similar to San Francisco, which has a homeless inhabitants six instances greater.
With makeshift tents lining streets and disrupting companies in communities throughout the state, homelessness has change into one in every of the most irritating points in California and one certain to canine Newsom ought to he ever mount a nationwide marketing campaign.
Newsom touted the proposition as the remaining piece in his plan to reform California’s psychological well being system. He has already pushed for legal guidelines that make it simpler to pressure folks with behavioral well being points into therapy.
William Elias, a tv producer in Sacramento, stated he “was on the fence” about Proposition 1 however determined to vote in favor of it due to the pervasive homelessness downside.
“That’s something that’s all around us right now,” he stated. “We got all these tents out here in front of City Hall.”
Estrellita Vivirito, a Palm Springs resident, additionally voted ‘sure’ on the measure.
“It’s only logical, you know, we have to do something,” she stated.
Katherine Wolf, a doctoral scholar at the University of California, Berkeley, stated she voted ‘no’ on the measure out of issues it could lead to extra folks being locked up towards their will.
“I was appalled of the system of laws that he has been building to kind of erode the rights of people with mental disabilities,” Wolf stated of Newsom.
Griffin Bovee, a Republican state employee in Sacramento, additionally voted towards the proposition and stated the state has been losing taxpayer cash.
“Sacramento really shouldn’t get another dime until they actually figure out why what they’re doing is not working,” he stated of the state’s dealing with of the homelessness crisis. “They spent $20 billion over the past few years trying to fix that problem and it got worse.”
Revenue from the tax on millionaires, now between $2 billion and $Three billion a yr, offers about one-third of the state’s complete psychological well being finances.
Opponents, together with some county officers, psychological well being service suppliers and a few Republicans, stated the poll measure would lower funding from cultural facilities, peer-support packages and vocational companies and would pit these packages towards companies for homeless folks.
Newsom’s administration has already spent a minimum of $22 billion on numerous packages to tackle the crisis, together with $3.5 billion to convert rundown motels into homeless housing. California can also be giving out $2 billion in grants to construct extra therapy amenities.