The Virat Kohli no-ball debate has had the cricketing fraternity divided. The likes of Irfan Pathan, Aakash Chopra, Harshal Bhogle, and so forth. have sided with the umpire’s official name, which is to award the dismissal to Kolkata Knight Riders pacer Harshit Rana. However, there are these too like Navjot Singh Sidhu, who do not feel the umpires made the correct name in ruling the Royal Challengers Bengaluru stalwart out. In a prolonged video on social media, Sidhu tried to clarify the elements that needs to be put into consideration earlier than such selections are made on the sector by the umpires.
To start with, Sidhu mentioned that Kohli’s dismissal hasn’t simply left him dissatisfied for a batter but in addition for RCB who might’ve emerged triumphant had the choice gone within the favour of the batting facet.
“When you’ve made a rule by bringing a 6-inch height-based ideology, did you give the batter a 7-inch allowance? That is number one,” Sidhu mentioned, making his first level.
In the second level, the previous India all-rounder seemed to clarify how the umpires ‘legalised’ using beamers within the sport by calling Harshit Rana’s supply to Virat Kohli ‘truthful’.
“Number 2, the biggest point. You legalised a beamer. During my 30 years of playing and watching cricket, if a bowler missed a yorker and bowled a waist-high delivery, the batter would be left bamboozled and the bowler would apologise. If tomorrow a batter steps out and the ball is targetted on his head, won’t you even apologise for legalising a beamer?”, he asserted.
The legislation should change for the higher …@imVkohli @IPL pic.twitter.com/cQIWaSxIfc
— Navjot Singh Sidhu (@sherryontopp) April 21, 2024
In his third and last level, Sidhu questioned the expertise which instructed that the ball would’ve witnessed a large dip by the point it might’ve reached the popping crease. Sidhu wasn’t in settlement with the trajectory proven on the display screen.
“At the point of impact, at the point of impact, the ball is at least a foot and a half above the waist. And the batter is six inches outside the crease. Do you mean to say that the ball will dip 6 a foot and a half in the remaining six inches? Benefit of the doubt must go to the batter. Laws always change for the better. Laws are made to better the game. Change is not necessarily progress. This law needs to be carefully monitored, and amended. Kohli should have gotten the benefit of the doubt. He was not out,” he concluded.
Topics talked about on this article