IPL 2024 Points Table: What 2nd Consecutive Loss vs LSG Means For CSK | Cricket News

- Advertisement -

Chennai Super Kings dropped to the fifth spot within the IPL 2024 factors desk after struggling a six-wicket loss in opposition to Lucknow Super Giants on Tuesday. Ruturaj Gaikwad’s century went in useless as Marcus Stoinis slammed an unbeaten 124 to information LSG to victory. CSK have eight factors in eight matches proper now with a wholesome Net Run Rate of 0.415. On the opposite hand, LSG moved as much as fourth with 10 factors from eight matches however their NRR will not be higher than CSK’s. Rajasthan Royals are on the prime of the desk with 14 factors adopted by Kolkata Knight Riders and Sunrisers Hyderabad (each with 10 factors).

KL Rahul was all reward for Marcus Stoinis’ match-winning 63-ball-124 not out in opposition to Chennai Super Kings as he felt that the house workforce’s rating of 210 for four was at the least 30 runs above-par on that exact Chepauk monitor.

Stoinis’ particular effort overshadowed an aesthetic century by CSK skipper Ruturaj Gaikwad of their IPL match on Tuesday as LSG received by six wickets.

Rahul, who as soon as stated strike-rates are over-rated in T20s, admitted {that a} complete like 180 which was thought of difficult won’t be sufficient within the day and age of ‘Impact Player’.

“Very special (win), especially when it is a game like that. It felt like we were way behind the game in the chase. Just to pull off a victory feels special,” Rahul stated on the post-match presentation ceremony.

Rahul stated their win in opposition to CSK in Lucknow had little context on a really completely different Chennai deck.

“These were different conditions. They got off to a good start and put pressure on the bowlers. I didn’t think it was a 210 wicket.

“They batted really well. All credits to Stoinis. He was phenomenal to watch. It was not just power hitting, but was smart batting.” Sending Stoinis at No. three was a wise transfer by LSG administration and Rahul feels they needed to take a “brave” name.

“We wanted to be a lot braver as a team. We had three games, a couple at home, and some away where we couldn’t go past 170. We needed one power hitter in the top three. That was the thought process.

“I have also realised that T20 cricket has changed in the last couple of years – 170-180 does not always cut it. You have to go harder in the powerplay.

“The Impact player gives you depth and that gives you more freedom. I have not played T20 cricket in a long time.” Asked if Nicholas Pooran can play up the order, the skipper stated save him and Quinton de Kock as openers, not one of the different positions are fastened.

“There is no set plan. Apart from the openers everyone is set to go at any point. The last game, Pooran walked in at three. Hope I get the fielder of the award.” CSK skipper Gaikwad, whose century went in useless felt that dew performed an enormous function in direction of the latter half of the match.

“Tough pill to swallow but LSG played a good game at the end. We had the game in hand around the 13th over, but hats off to Stoinis.

“There was a huge part that the dew played. It took the spinners away from the game. We could have taken the game deeper. But it is a part of the game, you can’t control the uncontrollable.” Player of the match Stoinis stated: “It is not just a go go. It was ebb and flow. There were some bowlers we targeted, some against whom we were cautious. Nicky Pooran played a good innings, Hooda also.

“It ebbed and flowed. From the inside you are always structuring. You are liking some bowlers, not liking others much.”

(With PTI inputs)

Topics talked about on this article

Source link

- Advertisement -

Related Articles