Australia is facing serious climate challenges. A recent report warns of more flooding, cyclones, heatwaves, droughts, and bushfires. By 2050, over 1.5 million Australians could be affected by rising sea levels.
In a controversial decision, Environment Minister Murray Watt approved Woodside to continue operations at its North West Shelf facilities for another 40 years. This decision came despite evidence that industrial emissions are harming ancient Indigenous rock art nearby. Woodside even pushed for a reduction in the approval requirements, citing operational concerns.
So why is there a gap between our knowledge of climate change and our actions? Crikey reached out to 12 experts to unpack this issue.
One key point is that not all communities will suffer equally. Some places, especially coastal areas, are more vulnerable to extreme weather. This can lead to economic disruptions and increased living costs. For instance, insurance rates may rise as property damages mount. Ecosystems, which provide clean air, water, and natural disaster protection, are at risk as well. Without immediate action, Australia could lose vital species and habitats by mid-century.
Experts warn that more frequent and severe weather events will disrupt everyday life. From sports to energy supply, the impacts will be felt across various sectors. Emergency services will be stretched thin as floods and fires become more common. This also endangers water quality at a time when resources are already limited.
Historically, humanity has altered ecosystems—sometimes destructively. Rachel Carson noted in her groundbreaking book, Silent Spring (1962), how human actions have devastated wildlife. Today, the urgency for change is even greater. The United Nations recognized the dangers of rising greenhouse gas emissions back in 1988, yet action has lagged.
In the past few decades, we’ve seen alarming consequences. Former UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher pointed out that every nation will be affected by climate change, emphasizing that developed countries must lead the charge.
The reality is that nearly all climate scientists agree on human-induced global warming—around 97%, according to multiple studies. Yet public skepticism remains, partly due to misinformation campaigns. A memo by Republican strategist Frank Luntz from 2002 highlighted the importance of maintaining doubt about climate science among voters.
The consequences of our inaction are stark. Naomi Klein wrote about the absurdity of natural disasters hitting the very industries causing them. For example, oil companies were forced to shut down during floods in Calgary, highlighting a clear conflict between resource extraction and climate stability.
Moreover, indigenous knowledge offers valuable insights into sustainable practices. Philip Marrii Winzer argues that Indigenous systems can guide us toward a more equitable and caring society.
However, despite widespread awareness, many Australians are tuning out climate news. A study from the University of Canberra found that around 69% of Australians actively avoid climate-related news, feeling overwhelmed by the constant flow of information.
This avoidance has real consequences. Recognizing the pattern of climate change impacts is essential. Only through open discussions and a commitment to systemic change can we hope to pave a sustainable future for Australia.
For more detailed insights and the latest statistics on climate-related issues, check the National Climate Risk Assessment.
Source link
climate change,ENVIRONMENT,murray watt,woodside



















