Youth climate activists in Wisconsin are taking legal action against the state’s Public Service Commission. They argue that current laws favor fossil fuels over renewable energy, worsening the climate crisis that is impacting their lives.
This lawsuit follows severe flooding in southeast Wisconsin, described by the Wisconsin State Climatology Office as the worst since 2008. Such extreme weather events are becoming more common due to climate change, primarily caused by greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels. However, state law prevents regulators from considering these emissions when approving new fossil fuel projects.
The activists, supported by the nonprofit Our Children’s Trust, assert that this legal framework violates their rights. The lawsuit was filed in Dane County Circuit Court, targeting laws that restrict the ability to require increased renewable energy supplies. The plaintiffs, aged 8 to 17, say they have personally experienced negative effects, including health issues like asthma and the trauma linked to environmental damage.
One plaintiff, Kaarina D., describes her family’s need to relocate after significant flooding damaged their home. “The bluff where my family lived became dangerous, and we were forced to move,” she said, linking her experience directly to climate change.
Currently, fossil fuel plants generate about 75% of Wisconsin’s electricity. Despite a goal set by Governor Tony Evers for 100% carbon-free electricity by 2050, the youth claim state laws hinder transition to renewable sources. The Public Service Commission can’t deny permits for fossil fuel projects due to restrictive legislation.
The plaintiffs are also challenging laws that limit renewable energy increases to a 10% baseline. This cap on renewable energy ultimately locks the state into high fossil fuel usage.
The activists are asking the court to declare these laws unconstitutional, arguing for their right to a stable climate and to use the state’s waterways. They cite recent opinions from international courts affirming that a healthy environment is crucial for basic human rights. Such perspectives could strengthen their case, asserting that environmental protections must underlie rights to life and liberty.
In summary, this lawsuit highlights a growing movement among youth to hold governments accountable for climate inaction. As the climate crisis intensifies, similar cases are emerging across the U.S., reflecting a larger push for legislative change to address ecological concerns.
Source link