Beatriz Ychussie seemed to have a bright future in mathematics. At Roskilde University, Denmark, she published four research papers in just two years. They covered complex topics like quantum particles and heat flow. She also reviewed manuscripts for esteemed journals.
But an unexpected twist emerged: Beatriz didn’t exist. An investigation revealed she was one of 26 fictitious authors and reviewers connected to a network that infiltrated multiple mathematics journals published by Springer Nature. This fraud was part of a larger scheme by a company often called a “paper mill.” These companies create fake researchers, manipulating peer reviews and selling phony research papers to boost their clients’ academic profiles.
This particular scheme was significant, involving 55 articles published by creating a web of fake identities. After thorough investigations, Springer Nature retracted all compromised papers, highlighting a broader issue in scientific publishing.
Fake authors aren’t the only challenge. Many cases involve impostors stealing real researchers’ identities to increase the viability of fake submissions. This highlights a growing concern about trust in the academic community, as peer review relies heavily on knowing who is behind the work.
Various publishers are trying to combat this. They verify author identities in different ways. Some check if emails are from recognized institutions. Others go further, cross-checking research records and even asking for confirmation of contributions from co-authors.
However, verifying identity can be tricky. Many researchers communicate remotely, and stringent checks could unfairly exclude scholars from lesser-known institutions or early-career researchers who lack institutional email addresses. Adya Misra, a research integrity expert at Sage Publications, notes the delicate balance between ensuring verification and not creating barriers.
The problem of identity fraud in scientific publishing isn’t new. In 2018, a reader noticed two nearly identical papers published in different journals, which brought this issue to light. A further investigation revealed that these papers had used fake reviewers and authors—a loophole exploited for manipulation.
With the rise of AI, the concerns about fake publications are evolving. Diomidis Spinellis, a software engineer, recently discovered 48 articles in a journal that appeared to be generated by AI, some listing him as an author! This has sparked new fears and necessitated better practices in academic publishing.
Some publishers are adopting ORCID, a free identification platform for researchers. ORCID allows academics to link their work to a unique ID, making it easier to track publications across different jobs or institutions. While it’s not foolproof, it aids in building a transparent research community. Currently, around 10 million researchers use ORCID, promoting trust in an environment where identity verification is increasingly crucial.
In conclusion, while the journey to secure authenticity in scientific publishing is complicated, ongoing efforts and evolving technologies aim to combat fraud. The conversation continues as researchers, publishers, and academic institutions work together to ensure integrity in research.
Source link
Ethics,Publishing,Scientific community,Science,Humanities and Social Sciences,multidisciplinary
