Explore Our New Dashboard: Discover How Potential EPA Rollbacks Could Impact Texas’ Environment

A new tool from the Sierra Club shows how rollbacks on coal pollution rules could impact Texas. The Trump administration is changing key Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. These include the Mercury and Toxins Standard and the Greenhouse Gas Standards.

Joshua Smith, a senior attorney with the Sierra Club, warns that these changes could lead to more harmful chemicals in our environment. He explains, “Together, these rules could mean thousands of tons more pollution, like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.” Currently, Texas has 15 coal-fired power plants.

The EPA claims that these changes will cut costs for families. However, Smith emphasizes that the new mapping tool allows people to see how these rollbacks may affect each coal plant. “It’s a chance for the public to educate themselves and voice their opinions during the EPA’s rule-making process,” he says.

If the rules are weakened, Texas could see an increase of 90,000 tons of sulfur dioxide. This raises concerns about air quality and public health.

Beyond Texas, a broader conversation is happening about climate change. According to a recent survey, 90% of people worldwide are worried about it and want action from their governments. Yet, many think others don’t share their concern. Anthony Leiserowitz, from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, refers to this as a “perception gap.”

He points out that the misunderstanding extends to policymakers as well. Around 80% of congressional staffers underestimate how much their constituents care about reducing climate pollution. This gap could be keeping necessary action at bay.

In New Mexico, farmers are adapting to long-term droughts and climate change. They are now focusing on “healthy soil principles,” which enhance how land is managed. Dave Dubois, a climatologist, underscores the need for long-term planning. “Climate models show we’re facing warmer temperatures, which means hotter droughts,” he says.

Ernest Diswood, a Navajo conservation leader, has seen improvements in soil health using regenerative techniques. “We have around 21 grass species thriving despite the drought,” he shares. Farmers like Ralph Vigil have also changed their practices to conserve moisture and protect soil.

Data shows that soil degradation is influenced by various factors, including intensive farming and urbanization. This is a concern as agriculture remains New Mexico’s third-largest industry, essential for its cultural identity.

As communities deal with the impacts of climate change, legal avenues are emerging to hold corporations accountable. A recent study highlights the role of major fossil fuel companies, indicating they could be held responsible for climate-related damages. Justin Mankin from Dartmouth College explains that these companies could have avoided some environmental costs if they had mitigated their emissions.

This conversation on accountability is echoing in courts, where lawsuits are increasing against companies for climate damage. The cases could change the landscape of corporate responsibility in climate action, shaping a future where companies are held accountable for their environmental impact.

By understanding these dynamics, we can better navigate the challenges of climate change while advocating for smarter policies that promote healthier air, soil, and communities.



Source link

htmlcss bootstrap, multi level menu, submenu, treeview nav menu examples