Recently, President Trump has directed his criticisms at Harvard University again. This comes shortly after a judge ruled against his administration’s attempt to revoke Harvard’s ability to enroll international students.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that many countries of Harvard’s international students are “not friendly to the United States” and that they contribute “nothing” to their education costs. He also demanded transparency about these foreign students, suggesting that Harvard isn’t being open about them.
Harvard has not responded immediately to requests for comment. The university argued that Trump’s actions were a violation of the First Amendment, claiming they punished the institution for its independence in governance and curriculum.
Just days before Trump’s remarks, a federal judge temporarily blocked the government from enforcing its revocation of Harvard’s international student enrollment. Harvard President Alan Garber called this decision a crucial step in protecting the rights of international students, who make up about 27% of the university’s student body.
Interestingly, a recent survey showed that 60% of international students at U.S. universities feel welcomed on campus, even amid challenging political climates. However, this situation draws a sharp contrast. In April, the federal government paused over $2.2 billion in grants to Harvard after the university resisted demands related to hiring practices and admissions policies.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused Harvard of allowing antisemitism and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party, which she claimed justified the revocation. Critics of Trump’s actions argue that such moves create unnecessary tension and undermine academic freedom.
As the situation unfolds, a hearing is set for Thursday to determine whether the judge’s temporary restraining order will continue. This case is central to ongoing discussions about education policies and international cooperation.