Climate Change Experts Slam Government for Overlooking Critical Scientific Evidence

Some climate scientists have sent a strong warning to New Zealand’s Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, about the government’s methane target plans. They believe these plans could threaten global climate agreements. The Green Party has called for clarity on how the government intends to address methane emissions, which are the primary source of climate change in New Zealand.

New Zealand has one of the highest methane emissions per person in the world, largely due to its farming sector. The current goal is to reduce methane emissions by 24% to 47% by 2050. However, farming groups want the government to lower these targets and avoid pricing methane, which they argue could burden farmers.

In New Zealand, carbon dioxide has been priced since 2008. Yet, when tasked with setting appropriate methane reduction goals, the government opted for its own scientific panel instead of following the independent Climate Change Commission’s advice. This panel found that reducing methane by just 14% to 24% from 2017 levels could meet a target of “no additional warming” from agriculture. Critics argue this is a weak and misleading basis for action.

The scientists’ letter warned that aiming for "no additional warming" implies that existing methane levels are acceptable, which they are not. Methane is currently responsible for about 30% of global warming, and ignoring it jeopardizes both New Zealand’s climate commitments and efforts to meet global methane reduction goals.

When Luxon was challenged by these criticisms, he dismissed the scientists as "worthies," suggesting they should focus their efforts on other countries, as he believes New Zealand is already managing methane better than others.

Green Party co-leader Chloe Swarbrick responded by indicating that the Prime Minister is missing the bigger picture. She highlighted the risks his government is taking with its current strategy, stating that these weakened targets could endanger New Zealand’s export economy and international reputation.

Experts like Paul Behrens, an environmental change professor at Oxford, point out that setting weak targets can lead to global consequences, including more severe climate-related disasters. Drew Schindel from Duke University echoed this, stating that allowing countries to maintain current high levels of emissions sets a bad precedent for global climate action.

The pressure is growing for the government to respond to these alarming warnings, especially as the Climate Change Commission continues to advocate for stronger methane reduction targets. As New Zealand faces rapidly changing climate conditions, timely and decisive action is critical to ensure a sustainable future.

Climate Change Minister Simon Watts assured that the Cabinet is reviewing the situation carefully. However, the delay in setting clear targets has raised concerns from both industry groups and environmental advocates.

As discussions unfold, the need for accurate, science-based targets for methane emissions is becoming increasingly urgent. Farmers, consumers, and policymakers must work collaboratively to address the challenges posed by climate change while ensuring the agricultural sector’s viability.

For more in-depth information on New Zealand’s climate strategy, you can check the Climate Change Commission’s latest report.

Source link

Radio New Zealand, RNZ, Public Radio, News, Current Affairs, Audio, Podcasts