Miguel Uribe Turbay, a 39-year-old Colombian presidential candidate, was shot three times during a campaign event in Bogotá. He was speaking to a small crowd in a park when the attack happened. Reports indicate he was hit in the knee and twice in the head.
A 15-year-old suspect is in custody following the incident. Uribe’s wife, Maria Claudia Tarazona, urged the nation to pray for his recovery, asking for divine guidance for the doctors caring for him.
The attack has drawn strong reactions. Uribe’s political party, Centro Democratico, condemned the violence, highlighting its threat to political leaders and democracy in Colombia. The left-wing government, under President Gustavo Petro, also denounced the shooting. They emphasized that such acts undermine the very fabric of democracy.
Footage captured at the event shows the chaos that erupted as attendees fled in fear. Following the shooting, Uribe was airlifted to Sante Fe clinic, where supporters have gathered to keep vigil.
This incident is more than just a random act of violence; it reflects ongoing tensions in Colombia. Political violence is not new. Historically, the country has seen numerous attacks that disrupt the democratic process.
Public sentiment about political safety is shifting. A recent survey revealed that around 65% of Colombians feel political violence is on the rise. Many are concerned about the safety of candidates as elections approach.
The stakes are high as Uribe announced his candidacy for the 2024 presidential election just last month. Coming from a prominent political family, Uribe has deep ties to Colombia’s political landscape. His mother, journalist Diana Turbay, was tragically killed in 1991 during a kidnapping by the notorious Medellin cartel, highlighting the dangers many in the political sphere face in Colombia.
As this situation unfolds, it raises vital questions about political freedom and safety in a nation still grappling with its violent past.
For more insights on political violence in Colombia, you can check out the National Endowment for Democracy’s report.