Delhi University’s Manusmriti Ban: Unpacking the Controversy and Its Impact on Students

In February 1948, a significant moment unfolded in Prague when Klement Gottwald, the Communist leader, addressed a massive crowd in Old Town Square. Snow fell as he spoke, and his comrade, Clementis, kindly placed his hat on Gottwald’s head. This scene became iconic, captured in a photograph that spread throughout schools and museums, symbolizing the rise of Communist power in Bohemia.

However, history has its dark turns. Just four years later, Clementis was accused of treason and executed. In a move that echoed the tactics of oppressive regimes, he was erased from the narrative. Where he once stood in the photo, only the wall remained, leaving just Gottwald and his hat as remnants of that moment.

This incident reminds us of the current cultural and political climate in India. For the past decade, there’s been a noticeable effort to suppress ideas and texts that some find uncomfortable. A recent example comes from the University of Delhi. The Vice Chancellor mandated the removal of the Manusmriti, an ancient Hindu text, from the curriculum. This decision raised eyebrows because academic curricula are typically shaped by departments and faculty, not just a single administrative command.

The Vice Chancellor did not provide a clear reason for this removal, which is problematic. When academic materials are altered or excluded, it often stirs controversy, leading educators to question the motives behind such decisions. A colleague from the Department of Sanskrit mentioned that this wasn’t about ideology but rather a desire to avoid disputes. This leaves the conversation about the Manusmriti stagnant.

Why is this significant? The Manusmriti is not just an old text; it’s woven into India’s historical tapestry. It influenced thinkers like B.R. Ambedkar, who famously burned the text as a protest against its casteist principles. Ignoring this connection in discussions of Ambedkar’s life is like studying Gandhi without acknowledging his relationship with the text.

Moreover, the implications stretch beyond the Manusmriti. Recently, the administration suggested avoiding texts like Baburnama simply because it was written by an "invader." If this reasoning prevails, then many other historical figures and texts might also be deemed unsuitable for study.

The attempts to erase certain narratives have sparked debates on platforms like Twitter, where users express concern over academic freedom and the importance of teaching all parts of history, even those that might be uncomfortable. Social media trends highlight the growing demand for a more inclusive and honest portrayal of India’s past.

Education is not about endorsement; it’s about understanding. When we study controversial texts or figures, we gain insights into the complexities of our society. The goal is to cultivate critical thinkers, not mere followers. In the end, teaching diverse perspectives only enriches our understanding of history and culture, preparing students to engage thoughtfully with the world around them.

For further exploration of these educational shifts, sources like The Indian Express provide ongoing coverage and analysis.

Source link

Manusmriti ban Delhi University,Erasure of history in India,Hindutva and academic freedom,Ambedkar Manusmriti burning,Delhi University censorship controversy,Politics of syllabus in Indian universities,Communist erasure vs Hindutva censorship,Vice Chancellor Manusmriti directive,Controversy over teaching Baburnama and Iqbal,Textbook censorship in India