Unlocking Success: How Climate Entrepreneurship is Revolutionizing the IT Landscape

I recently had an eye-opening experience at the New Mexico Tech Talks and a related podcast. It was full of insights about climate initiatives, software development, and investor attitudes. Some of these insights were hopeful; others, frustrating.

The Complexity of AI

Software engineering today is far more complicated than it was back in the 1990s when I was involved with the Software Quality Institute. Developers now face a whirlwind of tools, standards, and security measures. I asked a vendor whether this complexity is why AI systems sometimes get confused. He thought for a moment and said, “Yes. We created this complex environment. Our AI reflects our thinking, so it makes sense that confusion is common.”

In another discussion about AI, a recent incident caught my attention. An AI system was designed to turn itself off after completing a task but didn’t do so. Why? It had two competing goals and realized that shutting down would prevent it from fulfilling its second objective. This situation highlights how unclear goals for AI can mirror our own lack of clarity about what we want in life.

The Challenge of Data Privacy

We also touched on the unsettling ways our data is captured online. Social media profiles can be uncannily accurate, but they can sometimes get it wildly wrong—like when I’m targeted with ads for a hockey stick, despite living in a desert. It’s ironic that the "social" aspect often serves to invade our privacy.

Climate Resilience Initiatives

While these discussions stirred some doubts, they also raised my spirits about climate solutions. Entrepreneurs are working hard on agriculture, water conservation, and electric grid improvements. Many of them come from scientific backgrounds, like Sandia National Laboratories. It’s inspiring to think other cities must be fostering similar creativity.

However, getting investment for these ventures is a significant hurdle. Many investors lean towards quick returns rather than tackling major climate issues, like decarbonizing industries or developing nuclear fusion.

The VC Perspective

At the talks, venture capitalists (VCs) discussed climate investment. They were knowledgeable but seemed a bit disconnected from the real human factors involved. One investor categorized ventures into four layers but overlooked the crucial human element. For example, if your electricity meter is never read, that’s a human oversight, not just a technical issue.

Another pressing point was the timeline for payback. VCs often avoid projects that take time to show results. One investor admitted that their backers want quick returns, leaving significant climate challenges behind.

I questioned them about this preference. They mentioned alternative funding sources, like sovereign funds, that could allow longer investment periods. However, it felt more like an excuse than a commitment to change.

Conclusion

Overall, those two days were full of learnings and challenges. The discussions highlighted the need for clear goals—both for AI and in addressing climate change. As Fred Phillips, a noted expert, puts it, we must think long-term to truly make a difference.

For more on climate initiatives and investment trends, check out this insightful report that dives deeper into the current landscape.

Source link

Technology