Why India Stands Alone: A Look at the Unique Changes to Its Constitution’s Preamble, According to Dhankhar

Dattatreya Hosabale, the general secretary of the RSS, recently sparked a discussion on the words "socialist" and "secular" in India’s Constitution. Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar chimed in, emphasizing that while these words were added through an amendment in 1976, the Preamble of any constitution should remain unchanged. He stated that the Preamble serves as the essence of the Constitution, defining its core values.

Dhankhar noted that India is unique, as it is one of the few nations where the Preamble has been modified. He highlighted the need for public dialogue and discourse on the Constitution’s principles, which reflect India’s democracy.

Hosabale’s comments suggested that the addition of these terms occurred during the Emergency period, when democratic institutions were under pressure. He raised questions about whether they should remain a part of the Preamble, arguing that they weren’t included in Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s original version of the Constitution.

This debate isn’t just political; it resonates with many citizens. A recent survey revealed that 62% of respondents think the Preamble should reflect the current societal values. Additionally, social media is buzzing with opinions on the topic, showcasing a mix of support and opposition.

Historically, this conversation echoes events from the 1970s when the Emergency led to significant changes in governance. The current discussions indicate a shift towards reassessing these historical amendments.

As citizens engage in this dialogue, it’s crucial to consider the role of the Constitution in shaping India’s identity and ensuring justice. The interplay of past and present could lead to a more informed public, creating a pathway for collective growth and understanding.

For further insights on constitutional changes, you can refer to this Parliamentary Research Report.

Source link