Kenya Takes a Stand: Joining the Fight for Emissions Levy on the High Seas at IMO

Kenya is taking a bold stand for climate action. The country recently backed a proposal for a shipping levy at the International Maritime Organization (IMO). This move comes during critical discussions at the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 83) in London, where over 50 nations are advocating for a universal tax on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in shipping.

This levy targets an industry responsible for nearly 3% of global GHG emissions, a number that continues to rise. Each year, shipping consumes over 200 million tonnes of fossil fuels. If unaddressed, this pollution threatens our climate goals.

Kenya’s climate envoy, Ali Mohamed, joined forces with countries like France and Spain to push for a levy on emissions from shipping fuel, proposing a starting price of at least USD 150 per tonne of CO2. This incremental approach aims to encourage the use of clean energy in the maritime sector.

Recent data supports this initiative. Studies show that a GHG levy could be the most effective way to reduce emissions in shipping. It also provides price stability that encourages investment in renewable fuels like hydrogen and ammonia. For instance, Maersk, one of the biggest shipping companies, is already investing in methanol-fueled ships but needs assurance that these investments won’t be undermined by lower-cost fossil fuels.

The IMO’s 2023 strategy aims for net-zero emissions by around 2050, with interim goals for significant reductions by 2030 and 2040. However, shipping demand could rise by as much as 60% during this period, which may lead to increased emissions despite improved efficiency.

There’s also a growing consensus among small island nations and developing countries, like Kenya, calling for the revenue from this levy to support clean energy projects and a Just and Equitable Transition (JET). This could help fund clean energy research and strengthen green infrastructure in vulnerable regions.

However, some larger economies are pushing back. They’re suggesting compromises like emissions exemptions, which could dilute the impact of the levy. This has led to frustrations among climate advocates who insist that only strong, binding commitments will suffice. “We didn’t come to London to approve a watered-down agreement,” noted Albon Ishoda from the Marshall Islands.

The outcome of this week’s negotiations could significantly influence climate action globally. If agreed upon, the rules will become legally binding, affecting every ship, port, and economy. Moreover, failures in these discussions would not only undermine the IMO’s credibility but also delay action, posing risks to low-lying nations like Kenya, where climate impacts are already felt through droughts and food insecurity.

As ocean temperatures rise and extreme weather increases, the urgency for decisive action grows. Kenya is paving the way for a proactive role in climate diplomacy, moving from a reactive stance to one of leadership and collaboration.

“This proposal is not just about us,” said Tuvalu’s Minister Simon Kofe during talks. It encapsulates a vision for future generations and emphasizes the need for immediate change to protect our shared home.

As discussions unfold, a commitment to environmental integrity will be key. Kenya’s push for a shipping levy is not just an initiative; it represents a critical step towards climate justice and a sustainable future.

Source link

Kenya shipping emissions levyGreenhouse gas levy IMO, International Maritime Emissions policy, Kenya climate diplomacy