A recent brain imaging study published in Current Biology shines a light on aphantasia, a condition where people can’t create mental images. Those with aphantasia describe it as a lack of visual “pictures” in their minds. Surprisingly, researchers found that even when these individuals try to imagine something, parts of their brains still activate, specifically in the early visual cortex.
This study aimed to understand how the brains of people with aphantasia work differently compared to those who can easily visualize. Researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare brain activity in 14 participants with confirmed aphantasia and 18 control participants who could generate vivid images.
Participants completed tests to assess their ability to visualize. Naturally, those with aphantasia scored low on the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire and showed minimal sensory bias when tested with the binocular rivalry paradigm, confirming their unique condition.
During the fMRI scans, participants were shown simple visual patterns and were asked to imagine them. The results revealed an interesting twist: while participants with aphantasia rated their imagery as nearly non-existent, their brains still showed evidence of activity.
In the control group, brain activity corresponded with the expected patterns when visualizing. In contrast, people with aphantasia demonstrated a unique brain response. Instead of the typical activation in the opposite hemisphere of the brain (contralateral), they exhibited stronger responses in the same hemisphere (ipsilateral). This suggests their brain organization works differently during visualization tasks.
What’s more intriguing is that, even though both groups could decode the intended imagery using brain data, those with aphantasia did not show the same overlap between imagery and actual perception as the control group did. Their brains encoded information about what they were attempting to imagine, but this did not match how they processed real visual experiences.
Researchers also noted that those with aphantasia engaged different parts of their brains associated with language and auditory processing, indicating that they might rely more on words or concepts rather than visual representations.
Experts emphasize that this study challenges previous beliefs about how brain activity is linked to conscious experience. Dr. Joel Pearson, a co-author of the study, highlights that these findings suggest not all neural representations lead to conscious images. Some may lack the quality needed for visual awareness.
The implications of this research extend beyond aphantasia. It raises questions about how our brains process imagination and perception in general. This new understanding could pave the way for further investigations into how different brain regions interact during visualization and what this means for cognitive processes.
Despite its limitations, such as a small sample size, the study offers crucial insights into the neural mechanisms behind aphantasia. As research continues, we might unravel more about how our brains represent imagery and how this relates to our experiences of the world.
For further reading, check out the full study “Imageless imagery in aphantasia revealed by early visual cortex decoding.”