State Department Layoffs: A Strategic Move for Building a Higher Quality Workforce, Says Deputy Secretary to Lawmakers

A senior official from the State Department recently defended significant layoffs, claiming they will enhance the quality of the workforce that supports the Trump administration’s foreign policy. Michael Rigas, the deputy secretary for management and resources, spoke to lawmakers about the termination of over 1,350 employees. He labeled this event as “the most complicated reduction in force” ever in government.

Rigas emphasized that, even though many qualified individuals lost their jobs, the remaining staff were selected based on merit. This means they have better tenure, experience, and skills to fulfill the department’s mission. He noted that the layoff process was conducted with guidance from the Office of Personnel Management.

The State Department had prepared for these layoffs by creating over 700 competitive areas for civil service employees and nearly 800 for foreign service workers. This strategy, however, drew criticism from organizations like the American Foreign Service Association. They argued the narrow definitions of competitive areas limited their ability to provide feedback and support for affected employees.

Rigas insisted the layoffs weren’t aimed at any specific individuals but were about addressing the needs of the mission. He explained that department leaders identified necessary functions and roles, and employees were evaluated accordingly.

As part of a broader reorganization, the State Department plans to merge or eliminate about 45% of its domestic offices. This reshaping stems from a need to streamline operations. Rigas noted that in the past, foreign policy decisions had to be approved by multiple offices, which slowed down processes. “We need to move at the speed of relevance,” he stated.

The administration is pushing for drastic cuts in funding for the State Department, seeking a nearly 50% reduction. House appropriators, however, are considering a more moderate cut of around 22%. The State Department has requested a budget of $28.5 billion for fiscal 2026, reflecting its intention to become more efficient.

Some lawmakers, particularly Democrats, expressed worry about the impact of these layoffs on national security roles. They argued that the loss of experienced personnel could hinder vital functions, such as arms control and drug interdiction at international borders. Rep. Madeleine Dean highlighted that essential public servants were let go, affecting stability in global relations.

In contrast, some lawmakers, including Committee Chairman Brian Mast, viewed the changes positively. He argued that they represent a critical overhaul aimed at strengthening the State Department’s effectiveness. He emphasized the importance of accountability and reform within the agency.

Amidst these discussions, many government officials and analysts are watching closely. A recent survey by the Center for American Progress revealed that over 70% of foreign policy experts believe the cuts could weaken the U.S.’s global standing. This concern reflects the broader implications of staffing changes in such a critical area of governance.

As the transformation continues, many in the department and beyond are left pondering how these shifts will shape the future of U.S. foreign policy. With changes happening at such a rapid pace, the effects—both immediate and long-term—are still unfolding.

Source link

michael rigas,state department