Columbia University Takes Action: 70+ Students Disciplined for Involvement in Campus Protests

Columbia University recently disciplined over 70 students for their roles in two protests on campus. A university spokesperson confirmed that these actions revolved around a protest at Butler Library, where around 80 participants were detained, as well as a demonstration during alumni weekend last year.

The university’s sanctions include a range of penalties, such as probation, suspensions lasting one to three years, degree revocations, and expulsions. Notably, two-thirds of the students facing suspensions were given a two-year term. Columbia’s disciplinary actions have sparked debates about the balance between maintaining order and allowing free speech on campus.

A group called Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), which is urging the university to cut ties with Israel, claimed nearly 80 students received notifications of suspension or expulsion following the protests that took place in May. They alleged that these letters required students to apologize to the university to regain campus access, raising concerns about academic freedom.

Columbia stated that its primary goal is to fulfill its academic mission. They emphasized that disruptions to academic activities violate university policies and would lead to consequences. Interestingly, these disciplinary measures come shortly after significant federal funding cuts by the Trump administration, which spurred the university to implement stricter policies.

Last year’s protests, inspired by the conflict in Gaza, drew both global support and criticism. Columbia became a focal point for university demonstrations, marking a shift in how campus protests are managed — it was the first time since the 1968 protests against the Vietnam War that police were allowed to intervene.

Concerns have been expressed by students about the increased risks of protesting after a fellow student, Mahmoud Khalil, was detained by immigration authorities for over 100 days. His experiences raised fears of similar outcomes for student activists.

Despite these concerns, many students continued to demonstrate. The May protest involved students occupying a library room, chanting, and clashing with police. Videos from the event show dramatic scenes as police initially prevented protesters from leaving.

The actions taken by Columbia reflect larger societal discussions about free speech, safety, and institutional accountability on college campuses. As student activism continues to evolve, the responses from universities will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future of campus engagement.

For additional context on the intersection of educational policies and student activism, you can read more in the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Source link