The recent decision by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to remove a key rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles has raised alarm among experts and local advocates. This rule, known as the endangerment finding, was established in 2009 and identified that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases harm public health.
This decision is not just about regulations; it could have severe repercussions for Long Island. Local health experts worry it will worsen air quality and make severe weather more dangerous. Adrienne Esposito, from the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, argues this move ignores the realities of climate change. She highlights that residents are already coping with rising sea levels and increased storms. Jane Fasullo from the Sierra Club adds that homeowners face skyrocketing insurance costs due to flooding risks from climate change, saying, “If you don’t fix your roof when it’s leaking, the whole frame of your house can rot.”
Experts like Jase Bernhardt, a geology professor at Hofstra University, warn that the effects of this policy might unfold gradually, making them harder to pin down immediately. He believes the long-term consequences could be damaging but insidious.
The transportation sector, one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, stands to be notably affected. The EPA’s reversal could undermine New York’s substantial investment in electric vehicle initiatives, potentially jeopardizing public health as studies show increased emissions worsen respiratory issues and other health problems.
State officials have expressed concern as well. Amanda Lefton, a DEC Commissioner, stated that reversing this rule could lead to heightened dangers, including more respiratory illnesses like asthma and cardiovascular diseases.
While the EPA argues that removing these regulations will reduce vehicle costs and expand consumer choices, many, including Jason Albritton from the Nature Conservancy, believe it’s vital to consider the long-term impacts on public health and the environment.
In recent surveys, a significant majority of Americans express concern about climate change and prefer more regulations to protect public health. It’s clear that this policy shift could be more than just a bureaucratic change; it could affect the quality of life for many.
The ongoing debate highlights a crucial intersection between policy, public health, and environmental justice. As these changes unfold, the real impact on communities, particularly those already vulnerable to climate challenges, remains to be seen.
Source link
Environment and nature, Government, TRUMP-ENV, Trump, TRUMP-LOCAL, TRUMP-SCI
