How a $2.4 Million Grant for Black Maternal Health Was Impacted by Trump’s Election

Jaime Slaughter-Acey, an associate professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, was shocked when her NIH-funded study on birth outcomes in Black families was cancelled. “It felt like the rug was pulled out from under us,” she shared. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) informed her that the study no longer aligned with their priorities and wouldn’t boost life expectancy.

This heartbreaking news reflects a larger trend. The Trump administration canceled almost 2,000 NIH grants, totaling over $4.4 billion, in its early months. Slaughter-Acey’s study, funded by a $2.4 million grant, aimed to analyze how social and biological factors impact pregnancy outcomes for Black women. It involved over 500 participants in Detroit, focusing on how social environments affect physiological aging, which can lead to pregnancy complications.

Slaughter-Acey’s research was unique. Unlike many studies that examine racism at a single point in time, hers explored how various forms of racism throughout a woman’s life influence her and her child’s health. This angle is crucial, as Black women are often underrepresented in health studies due to trust issues stemming from historical healthcare inequities.

The cancellation comes at a critical time. New CDC data shows Black women faced the highest rates of deaths related to pregnancy, with 50.3 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2023, compared to significantly lower rates for other ethnic groups. This disparity underlines the urgency of research focused on Black maternal health.

Slaughter-Acey described this grant termination as a threat to progress in addressing maternal death rates. She pointed out that limiting research in this area can endanger the health of vulnerable populations. “When science is silenced, communities suffer,” she said. This sentiment resonates with various experts who argue that cutting funding for maternal health research can exacerbate health inequalities.

Despite the setback, Slaughter-Acey remains hopeful. Recently, her team received short-term funding from Michigan State University, allowing them to continue their study for a few more months. Currently, they’ve enrolled nearly 600 mothers after recruiting from local hospitals shortly after childbirth. By gathering data on social determinants, such as housing and food insecurity, they aim to create a comprehensive view of maternal health for Black women.

Initial findings indicate that mothers with adverse childhood experiences often face relationship challenges, impacting both maternal and infant health. About 20% of participant grandmothers are also involved, providing insights into intergenerational health factors.

Slaughter-Acey advocates for research that genuinely reflects Black women’s experiences. She believes understanding the complex interactions of race, social environment, and health is vital to improving outcomes. Her project has the potential to change the conversation around maternal health by moving beyond mere survival to what thriving truly means for mothers and their infants.

As political changes continue to muddy the waters of scientific research funding, experts emphasize the need for dedicated support for studies like Slaughter-Acey’s. Ignoring these issues can perpetuate cycles of inequality that impact communities at large. Research that elevates marginalized voices is essential for building a more equitable healthcare system.

For more information on maternal health trends and the importance of such research, you can visit the CDC’s latest reports.

Source link