How Ancient DNA Unveils the Migratory Roots of Farming: A Shift from Local Adoption

About 10,000 years ago, a major change took place in human history: the shift from hunting and gathering to farming. This event, known as the Neolithic Revolution, started in the Fertile Crescent of the Middle East and eventually spread to Europe. There’s been a long debate among experts about whether farming expanded through the migration of farmers or if local hunter-gatherers simply adopted agricultural practices.

A groundbreaking study from researchers at Penn State sheds light on this question. Published in Nature Communications, the study combines ancient DNA analysis, archaeological findings, and advanced simulations. The results indicate that farming spread mainly through migration, rather than mere cultural exchange. According to the researchers, cultural adoption played a minor role, contributing just about 0.5% to the spread.

“Archaeology and genetics provide different perspectives on this transition,” said Christian Huber, a biology professor at Penn State. Analyzing artifacts helps reveal the use of domesticated plants and animals, while DNA from ancient bones shows the origins of these people. The researchers used models to track population growth and migration, comparing them with radiocarbon data from 618 Neolithic individuals across Europe. Their findings showed that migration was the primary driver of farming’s spread.

Interestingly, the study found that the rate of cultural transmission was quite low. Only about one in 1,000 farmers managed to convert a local hunter-gatherer into farming each year. Huber pointed out that even at this minimal rate, the impact on DNA and community structures was significant. “There’s this lasting imprint on European ancestry,” he explained.

Troy LaPolice, the lead author and a graduate student at Penn State, expressed surprise at the results. “Migration doesn’t always change local ancestry patterns, but in this case, it did,” he noted. This shows how trading ideas and practices isn’t enough; often, actual movement of people is necessary for significant changes.

The researchers also discovered strict social boundaries during this time. Farmers tended to marry within their communities, while hunter-gatherers did the same. This pattern led to less than 3% of marriages occurring between these two groups, a finding supported by previous ancient DNA studies. Even when these communities coexisted for long periods, they often remained genetically distinct.

This study enriches our understanding of how farming changed societies. It indicates that while ideas can spread on their own, the spread of farming was largely about people—bringing their crops, animals, and genes along with them. One study highlights the importance of both migration and genetics in shaping our understanding of early societies and their development.

The work aligns with recent trends in archaeological research, which increasingly points to the importance of migration in cultural change. As we continue to learn about our past, this study serves as a reminder of how interconnected our histories are and how migration has played a vital role in shaping those histories.

Source link

Neolithic