Florida Atlantic University’s House of Representatives recently faced a significant decision. On August 29, they voted on a resolution that opposed the FAU Police Department’s involvement in the federal 287(g) immigration enforcement partnership. The 287(g) program trains local law enforcement to enforce certain immigration laws, a move that has drawn concern from many students.
The resolution, authored by Parliamentarian Lina Vasquez-Baron, highlighted worries about how this partnership may erode trust between students and university police. It called for the FAU Police Chief to join a forum with student leaders and immigration specialists, aiming to create a space for discussion and transparency.
In the end, the resolution didn’t pass, with ten representatives voting against it and only four in favor. This outcome reflects the university’s alignment with Governor Ron DeSantis’ directive from February 19, urging state entities to cooperate with immigration enforcement. According to university spokespersons, this includes FAUPD and other state campus police.
Vasquez-Baron emphasized the student body’s need for safety and fair treatment. She stated, “It’s our duty to represent the interests and welfare of all students,” pointing out that such involvement in the 287(g) program might compromise that welfare.
Conversely, Representative Faisal Albaldawi, who opposed the resolution, expressed his understanding of the fears students might have regarding immigration matters. He emphasized that his position was not based on ignorance but rather on concerns about the authority of the student government and the potential repercussions of opposing state directives.
Florida’s SB 168 further complicates this issue, as it obligates state entities to support federal immigration enforcement. Albaldawi noted that the resolution could position the university counter to state and federal government, potentially damaging its credibility.
This sentiment was echoed by Speaker Pro Tempore Nick Special, who noted that similar resolutions had been brought up before but never passed. He indicated that while personal opposition to the program exists, the student government’s role should remain focused on supporting all students rather than engaging in political battles.
The reactions from students and representatives underscore a growing concern over immigration policies and their impact on campus life. As discussions continue, it raises questions about the balance between enforcement and the protection of students’ rights.
For more insights into immigration enforcement and its implications across the nation, you can explore resources from the American Civil Liberties Union here.
