Microsoft has made a significant move by cutting off the Israeli military’s access to technology used for extensive surveillance in Palestinian territories. Recently, the company informed Israel’s Unit 8200 that they had violated terms of service by storing massive amounts of surveillance data on Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform.
This decision stems from a recent investigation by The Guardian, revealing how Azure was used to handle and analyze numerous phone calls made by Palestinians in both Gaza and the West Bank. The findings showcased that Unit 8200 had built a system to collect and replay cellular calls, amassing data equivalent to 8,000 terabytes. Astonishingly, this program reportedly allowed the agency to capture “a million calls an hour.”
The project began after a 2021 meeting between Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella and Unit 8200’s former commander. Following the investigation, Microsoft ordered an external inquiry to reassess its dealings with the unit. Initial findings led to the termination of the unit’s access to certain cloud and AI services.
Amid pressure from employees and investors, Microsoft emphasized its commitment to not support mass surveillance. Microsoft’s president, Brad Smith, confirmed in an email to staff that they do not provide technology for civilian surveillance, a principle the company has maintained for over twenty years.
The backlash against the military’s surveillance practices gathered momentum after the publication of the investigation. Protests erupted at Microsoft’s headquarters and various locations worldwide, highlighting the growing scrutiny over the technology industry’s involvement in military actions. Recently, a United Nations report accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza, a claim that remains disputed within Israel, yet it draws attention to the humanitarian crisis unfolding amid the conflict.
Reports estimate that over 60,000 Palestinians have died since the onset of the current conflict, a staggering figure that raises troubling questions about the implications of technology in such scenarios. The reality is stark: the civilian toll of tech usage in warfare can be immense, impacting lives long before any casualties are reported.
As the situation develops, questions linger about the future of international tech partnerships with military organizations, especially concerning data management and ethical considerations. The recent actions may pave the way for more scrutiny of how technology firms operate under conflict conditions, encouraging a shift towards responsible practices.
For further context on the magnitude of the conflict and its implications, consider exploring data from recent UN reports or insights from human rights organizations. These sources can help shed light on the consequences of military surveillance on civilian populations.
Source link
