California Governor Gavin Newsom has faced backlash from climate activists after signing SB 237, a bill that will expand oil drilling in the state. Critics, including Indigenous and environmental groups, argue that it will worsen health issues for frontline communities already burdened by pollution. They gathered in New York City on September 24 during Climate Week, questioning Newsom’s commitment to climate action.
Newsom has long presented himself as a climate champion. He enjoys a high profile on social media and claims to combat Donald Trump’s policies. However, many activists feel he is compromising his values in favor of “Big Oil.” A large banner at the New York protest challenged him: “Gov. Newsom: If you can’t take on Big Oil, how can you take on Trump?”
During the signing ceremony for SB 237, Newsom touted a $60 billion electricity refund aimed at reducing costs for California families. He framed it as a significant climate victory, saying it stabilizes gasoline supply and supports clean energy initiatives. But many argue that the expansion of oil drilling contradicts these claims.
Victoria Rome from the NRDC Action Fund celebrated other parts of the climate legislation Newsom signed. She emphasized that California would continue to limit pollution through the Cap-and-Invest program, which requires polluters to pay for their emissions. Revenue would fund programs for clean transportation and affordable housing.
Yet, the signing of SB 237—expected to add 2,000 new oil wells yearly—has drawn sharp criticism. Starry Insixiengmay, of the Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla, expressed frustration. “Kids in my neighborhood played outside near oil refineries, not realizing the dangers. Newsom promised to protect communities but seems to backtrack,” she said.
The connection between fossil fuel expansion and political agendas is notable. Recent data shows that the oil and gas industry spent over $18 million in influence efforts in the first half of 2025 alone, with Chevron leading the charge. This significant financial clout raises questions about whose interests are prioritized in Sacramento.
Environmental organizations are concerned that Newsom’s actions will undermine both public health and climate progress. Jasmine Vazin from the Sierra Club emphasized that turning back on climate commitments erodes trust. “People are growing weary of politicians who prioritize polluters over public welfare,” she stated.
The urgency of climate action has never been more pressing. A recent survey from the Pew Research Center found that 75% of Americans believe climate change will significantly impact future generations. Many expect leaders to hold steadfast to environmental promises, especially as climate events become more frequent.
Newsom’s administration is thus at a crossroads. Facing increasing public and environmental scrutiny, the governor must balance competing interests and realign with his original climate goals. The next steps he takes could either cement his legacy as a climate leader or mark a retreat into fossil fuel dependency.
For more information on California’s environmental policies, you can visit the California Air Resources Board’s site.
