University Senate Revisits Controversial ‘U.S. Anti-Black Racism’ Course: What Students Need to Know

On October 6, the University of Connecticut Senate gathered at the Student Union to discuss the U.S. Anti-Black Racism course. This meeting took place amid increasing scrutiny from the federal government.

Interim provost S. Pamir Alpay led the discussion due to UConn President Radenka Maric being on vacation. Alpay emphasized the importance of feedback on the university’s budget and highlighted ongoing collaboration with the Connecticut government to address federal challenges.

During the meeting, Alpay faced a significant question: Would UConn give in to federal demands for funding? He assured attendees that the university must follow the law.

Alpay also mentioned UConn’s recent recognition, noting its placement at #32 in the US News Top Public Schools Ranking.

Next, Chair Bob Day addressed the proposed changes to the general education program, specifically the contentious Anti-Black Racism course. Originally approved as a requirement, the course has been reevaluated for legality, spurred by federal guidelines.

Day proposed a motion to rescind the earlier resolution making the course mandatory, citing concerns from the University General Counsel. The office expressed that the requirement could be viewed as illegal under current federal policies.

Senator Douglas Kaufman voiced his concerns, suggesting this move might indicate compliance with an overreaching federal mandate. He felt that the university should uphold its values and not let external pressure dictate its curriculum.

Senator Beth Ginsberg shared similar worries, fearing that this could create a “slippery slope” affecting courses related to sensitive topics, including LGBTQ+ and African American studies. She warned that educators might hesitate to teach essential subjects if they felt their positions were at risk.

Day reassured that, while the ABR course is under consideration, other classes focusing on minority issues are safe as long as they remain optional. He emphasized the need for a task force to thoroughly examine the course’s requirement status moving forward.

University General Counsel Nicole Fournier Gelston participated virtually, clarifying that the course requirement isn’t outright illegal, but could attract federal scrutiny if mandated. She suggested that compliance with legal guidelines is crucial.

Phoenix Harper, UConn’s Chief Diversity Officer, expressed disappointment at the potential removal of the requirement, stating it feels like a setback for students who face daily challenges related to racism. According to a recent survey, over 40% of Black students reported experiencing racial incidents on campus, underlining the importance of such courses.

To give more time for discussion, Senator Joseph MacDougald suggested pausing the requirement rather than abolishing it entirely. This idea gained strong support and was approved almost unanimously.

After discussing the ABR course, the Senate received a budget update from interim vice president for finance Reka Wrynn. She reported a significant drop in the university’s budget deficit, from over $100 million to $12.6 million, thanks to increased research funding. Wrynn hopes to balance the budget by year-end, but acknowledges ongoing challenges lie ahead.

The meeting concluded at 6:06 p.m. and the next session is slated for November 3, either in person or virtually.

Source link