The global food system is facing a serious challenge. It’s not just about rising food prices; it’s also about how our current practices impact the environment. According to the EAT-Lancet Commission report, our food systems contribute a significant 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Even with a full shift to clean energy, our current ways of producing food could still push temperatures past the critical 1.5°C mark. Dr. Gunhild Stordalen, a key voice in this discussion, highlights the critical risk of neglecting food systems in our climate strategies.
Presently, the food economy produces around $10 trillion annually, but it imposes an astonishing $15 trillion in hidden costs. These costs include health issues, lower productivity, and environmental degradation. As Dr. Stordalen puts it, if we don’t treat food systems as essential assets, we risk exposing the global economy to severe climate and health challenges.
Recent events have shown how fragile our food supply is. Climate impacts like droughts and floods are driving food prices to new heights. In fact, global food prices are currently 25-30% higher than pre-pandemic levels. This volatility harms not only consumers but also governments, which face increased financial pressure due to rising food costs.
Food’s role runs through every industry. It sustains the workforce, affects healthcare expenses, and balances supply chains. When food systems falter, everything else does too. Stordalen notes that shifting to a healthier diet could prevent 15 million premature deaths annually and boost overall productivity. This transformation would be beneficial for both public health and economic stability.
Despite the urgency, food systems receive less than 5% of global climate finance. The World Bank has called for an eighteen-fold increase in investment to tackle food system emissions. In reality, for every $200 to $500 billion invested in transforming food systems, we could see returns of around $5 trillion due to savings in healthcare and other factors.
How can we move forward? The EAT-Lancet Commission suggests changing financial incentives that currently reward harmful practices. Many agricultural subsidies still support large-scale animal production, contributing heavily to emissions. Redirecting these funds could create more impact than introducing new revenue streams.
For real change to happen, policy clarity is essential. Governments should set stable, science-based targets and establish accountability mechanisms. This would help guide capital investments towards sustainable food systems. Initiatives are already in play, like the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, which help investors identify and manage food-related risks.
The vision for the next decade includes integrating food-system stability into economic frameworks. Picture agricultural loans that promote environmentally friendly practices and pension funds acknowledging food-system risks. Achieving this vision is critical; it’s not just an option anymore, but a necessity for sustainability.
In summary, the balance of our global economy hinges on transforming our food systems. The question is no longer if change is feasible, but how quickly we can adapt without limiting our resources. It’s time we recognize the importance of food systems in safeguarding both our health and the planet.
Source link
financing food systems,regenerative agriculture investment,planetary boundaries,food security,EAT-Lancet 2025 report,food system transformation,climate risk,EAT,Lancet
