The Pentagon recently received a surprising $130 million donation to cover military salaries during the government shutdown. However, experts say this funding can’t be legally used without approval from Congress.
President Trump mentioned on Thursday that a “friend” provided this donation to address a shortfall in military pay. However, details on how this amount was determined remain unclear.
Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell confirmed that the Department accepted the gift under a law allowing such donations. He stated it should be used for Service members’ salaries and benefits, thanking the donor after paychecks were at risk due to political gridlock.
In a twist, the Pentagon managed to find around $8 billion in unused research funds from last year. This allowed them to issue paychecks mid-month. Nevertheless, legal experts, like David Super from Georgetown University, emphasize that while the Pentagon can accept gifts, spending those funds without Congressional approval would violate the law.
Super explained, “The government cannot depend on this gift to pay salaries. That must come from a valid appropriation from Congress.” He pointed out that if funds are unavailable, the Pentagon can only hold onto the gift until approval is received.
This situation is not the first of its kind for the Pentagon. A recent controversial move involved redirecting $8 billion from research budgets to cover military pay, raising significant legal concerns. Federal funding must always align with Congressional appropriations, meaning moving funds can introduce complications, especially when accounts have already expired.
Some experts see a potential gray area. Rich Brady from the Society of Defense Financial Management noted that the Pentagon could argue that using the donation doesn’t violate laws since there are no existing budgets during the shutdown. However, this leads to questions about setting a precedent for accepting private funds to cover military salaries in the future.
Military pay has become a heated issue amid the shutdown. Historically, legislation like the Pay Our Military Act ensured that troops received their pay during prior shutdowns. This time, however, House Speaker Mike Johnson has refused to advance similar legislation, stating that the House has fulfilled its responsibilities already.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans attempted to push a bill to ensure military pay during the shutdown. This effort was blocked by Democrats, who favored a broader bill covering pay for all federal workers.
In a world where public trust is crucial, experts worry that this reliance on private funds can lead to bigger issues. As Super articulated, “It raises concerns about the identity and motives of anonymous donors.” The implications of such donations could mean a shift in how military funding is perceived at a national level.
For a deeper dive into similar concerns regarding government funding, you can check out resources from the [Government Accountability Office](https://www.gao.gov/).
Source link
antideficiency act,continuing resolution,defense appropriation bill,donald trump,government shutdown,mike johnson,ndaa,pay our troops act
