Sidekicks sounded like a fun addition to Fortnite. Who wouldn’t want a cute pet to follow them in-game? However, player reactions have turned negative. Many are upset over how these Sidekicks are introduced, with some even calling for a boycott due to concerns about pricing and fairness.
There are three main issues players are highlighting. First, you can only customize your Sidekick once. For example, a banana dog named Peels was introduced, but once you pick its color and size, that’s it. Want a different look? You’ll need to buy a second Sidekick. Second, only your teammates can see these Sidekicks during the game, which makes them less visible to opponents. Finally, some leaks suggest future Sidekicks could cost a whopping 2,800 V-Bucks each. That’s causing quite a stir!
Hey @Fortnite, please make the pricing more reasonable and let us edit our pets to whatever we want for FREE once we own them.
“You can purchase the same Sidekick multiple times to give them different appearances” pic.twitter.com/0B1CtTtDwS
— Fortnite Leaks | Pluto V2 (@FortnitePV2) October 31, 2025
One player, Mabdog420, shared their frustration on Reddit: “Why should I just ignore it? If we accept this, it could lead to even worse practices. Epic has a history of pushing for predatory pricing.” Many feel that this approach undermines the community.
Interestingly, some players received a survey asking for feedback about Sidekicks before their official launch. One question inquired about how they felt about having to buy duplicates for customization. Many replied with strong disapproval, questioning who would support such a model.
Fortnite is currently sending out surveys to players about Sidekicks and their controversial features 👀
They want player opinions on “basic features” being permanently locked and the re-purchase system pic.twitter.com/oJUEODR32C
— Shiina (@ShiinaBR) November 2, 2025
However, some players believe the community won’t resist the urge to buy. They recall when Fortnite introduced cosmetic shoes that were hardly visible to others, yet many still bought them. “Those shoes felt like a scam, too,” mentioned one player. This growing trend has led to feelings of disillusionment among long-time fans.
“As someone who’s been a fan since the beginning, it’s disappointing to see where we are now,” lamented another player. “It feels like we’re fighting a never-ending battle for fairness. It’s just exhausting.”
In an era where gaming companies face scrutiny over their monetization strategies, this situation with Fortnite highlights a wider discussion about fairness and community engagement. To stay relevant and respected, developers need to listen to players. It’s a delicate balance between profit and player satisfaction, and how they handle this could shape the future of gaming.
Source link
Fortnite
