During a recent lecture series in Bengaluru titled “100 Years of Sangh Journey: New Horizons,” RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat emphasized that the term “Hindu” is about civilizational identity rather than just religion. He believes it includes all Indians—Hindus, Muslims, Christians, and others—as long as they regard themselves as part of “Bharat Mata” and move past their “separateness.”
Bhagwat explained that everyone in India shares a common heritage and that the country’s core culture is rooted in its Hindu ancestry. His statement, “There is no ‘Ahindu’ in India,” sparked discussions about the inclusiveness of this view. Supporters argue that it promotes a shared national identity, while critics question how practical or genuinely inclusive this perspective is.
Understanding Bhagwat’s Definition of Hindu
In his address, Bhagwat described “Hindu” as a civilizational identity grounded in geography, cultural traditions, and devotion to the nation, rather than merely a religious label. He invited individuals from diverse faiths to join RSS groups if they acknowledge their connection to a unified Indian identity.
He pointed out that historically, the term “Hindu” was used by outsiders to describe the inhabitants of “Akhand Bharat,” or undivided India. By defining “Hindu” as synonymous with “Bharatiya” and “Hindavi,” his aim is to foster unity rather than exclusion. He stressed that the RSS focuses on selfless service and national pride, encouraging every Indian to embrace values like sacrifice and cultural preservation.
The RSS Vision for Unity
Bhagwat’s concept of a “Hindu Rashtra” is framed as promoting unity within diversity, not exclusion. He stated that justice should be universal and that his vision is not about seeking political power. “Diversity does not cause disunity,” he claimed, underscoring that true unity can be found in the richness of varied backgrounds.
Context of Ongoing Debates
These remarks arrive in a context filled with discussions about the role of the RSS in shaping Indian identity. Historically, the organization has faced bans due to political controversies but has continuously been affirmed by the courts as a legitimate entity within the Indian Constitution. Bhagwat explained that the RSS chooses not to register formally, operating as a community of individuals under constitutional protection.
Despite criticisms about financial transparency, particularly from Karnataka’s IT minister Priyank Kharge, Bhagwat maintained that the RSS’s operations are compliant with the law.
Broader Perspectives
A broader perspective highlights that dialogues around national identity are crucial in a country as diverse as India. While Bhagwat’s framing of a civilizational identity may resonate with many, it’s essential to ensure all communities feel valued. Conversations about identity in India should be approached with empathy, recognizing the intricacy of various faiths and cultures that define the nation.
Recent Context and Trends
In a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, 70% of Indian respondents expressed pride in their religious identity, but only 27% believed that their religion should define who belongs in the nation. This indicates a shift toward inclusivity as more people start to value cultural rather than strictly religious identity.
While Bhagwat’s vision aims to unite all Indians under a common identity, the conversation around inclusivity remains vital in ensuring that everyone’s voice is heard and respected in India’s diverse landscape.
For further details on the RSS’s legal status, visit The Tribune.
