You’ve probably come across recent videos showing federal agents using extreme force during immigration protests. Many clips show techniques like chokeholds and pepper spray that raise questions about whether agents followed Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policies.
We spoke to Eric Balliet, a former federal agent with over 20 years of experience. He investigated use-of-force misconduct and believes current tactics are alarming. “This isn’t the law enforcement I practiced,” he shared.
On the other hand, Customs and Border Protection commander Gregory Bovino defended these actions, stating that protesters put themselves at risk. He emphasized that anyone trespassing should expect consequences.
Recently, a federal judge ruled against using chemical sprays unless they’re needed to prevent immediate harm. This decision has prompted DHS to revise its use-of-force guidelines quickly. Balliet supports this ruling, describing the current level of force as shocking and unwarranted.
One significant concern is the use of less-lethal munitions. Videos show agents firing projectiles at demonstrators’ heads and torsos, which goes against agency policy prohibiting targeting above the waist. Balliet pointed out that this shows a lack of proper training.
Moreover, footage from various protests reveals agents deploying tear gas and pepper spray at very close range. This raises further questions. Simply yelling does not justify such aggressive responses, according to Balliet. In previous studies, injuries from close-range sprays have led to serious eye damage.
Another disturbing tactic is the use of vehicles to push back protesters. Balliet described this as a potential deadly force, given the risk involved. The operation’s unmarked vehicles and lack of communication heightened the danger.
Furthermore, videos have emerged of agents using chokeholds, which DHS policy strictly forbids unless deadly force is authorized. Balliet stated that even in chaotic situations, such force is inappropriate and should lead to immediate disciplinary actions.
Despite these alleged violations, no agents in Chicago have faced consequences. Bovino insists that actions during protests were within policy. This lack of accountability might damage public trust in law enforcement, Balliet warns. He believes rebuilding this trust will take years, if it’s even possible.
In contrast, DHS claims that its agents have shown incredible restraint when faced with real dangers, such as rocks and fireworks thrown by protesters. However, many onlookers question whether these responses align with fostering a safe environment for everyone.
Given the ongoing debate around police tactics, understanding the balance between safety and rights during protests remains crucial. Social media continues to amplify these discussions, with hashtags like #PoliceBrutality and #ProtestRights trending as activists and citizens voice their opinions on law enforcement conduct. This conversation is far from over, and it will be interesting to see how policies evolve in response to public sentiment.
For further reading on this topic, you may find the DHS Use of Force Policy insightful.
Source link
Immigration
