The federal government is increasingly challenging higher education. This is troubling because universities are places where critical thinking thrives—something that any authoritarian regime fears. From the moment Trump took office, his administration targeted key pillars of civil society: the free press, the justice system, and higher education, all crucial for encouraging independent thought.
Shockingly, institutions of journalism and academia have often remained passive. Many have accepted unreasonable demands and even financial penalties. For instance, CBS has started vetting transcripts from 60 Minutes for government approval. Columbia University hired an officer to ensure compliance with governmental restrictions, and Cornell accepted a similar settlement. These changes compromise academic independence.
Universities can’t continue to stay silent or comply. It’s time for them to stand up. Here are three essential actions they must take:
1. Solidarity
From its founding in 1915, the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) has fought for academic freedom, born from events that occurred at Stanford in 1900. A professor was forced to resign after criticizing the railroad industry, linked to the university’s wealth. This sparked a movement of faculty resignations in protest, highlighting the need for collective action in defending academic freedom.
Today, institutions face serious threats: attempts to revoke accreditation for political reasons, harassment of international students, and major funding cuts. For instance, UCLA is facing a staggering $1.25 billion fine. To resist these pressures, universities need to unite in their response. A divided response will only weaken their collective power.
2. Integrity Over Neutrality
The idea of “institutional neutrality” has often become a cover for inaction. Derived from a 1967 report from the University of Chicago, this principle suggests that universities should not take collective political stances. However, in today’s environment, that’s unrealistic. Each university’s budget and hiring decisions reflect its values, whether they admit it or not. When universities prioritize safety over their core values—like free inquiry—they risk losing their very mission.
True integrity means openly defending principles like equal access and reasoning based on evidence. If universities stay neutral while facing threats to their values, they risk losing everything worth protecting.
3. Empower Student Voices
Universities have increasingly restricted student speech, especially during commencement ceremonies. For example, USC canceled valedictorian Asna Tabassum’s speech criticizing social media policies. Similar incidents occurred at George Washington University and NYU, where students faced retaliation for speaking out on controversial topics. Stanford has also informed its faculty that student speeches will not be allowed at their commencement, undermining the very education students receive.
By taking these steps—solidarity, integrity, and empowering student voices—universities can reclaim their role as bastions of free thought. They have a responsibility to protect open dialogue and support their academic communities. If they fail to act now, what will happen to higher education?
Jessica Riskin is a professor in the history department and co-president of Stanford’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP).
Source link
aaup,american association of university professors,federal govenrment,free speech,institutional neutrality,journalism,justice higher education,stanford,student speech,trump administratino,university
