FBI Investigates: Sen. Mark Kelly and Other Democrats Targeted for Alleged Seditious Behavior by Trump

Admin

FBI Investigates: Sen. Mark Kelly and Other Democrats Targeted for Alleged Seditious Behavior by Trump

U.S. Senator Mark Kelly from Arizona and five other congressional Democrats recently found themselves in hot water over a video encouraging military personnel to refuse unlawful orders. The FBI is now looking to interview these lawmakers as part of an investigation.

Last week, former President Donald Trump criticized the video. He accused Kelly and others of “seditious behavior.” The term “traitors” was tossed around, and he even remarked that such actions “in the old days” could have led to a death sentence.

Among the lawmakers featured in the video are Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin and Representatives Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, Chris Deluzio, and Chrissy Houlahan. In response to Trump and the FBI’s actions, Goodlander and others released a joint statement, calling the investigation an act of intimidation. They asserted that their commitment to uphold the Constitution would not waver.

The situation escalated when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly criticized Kelly for how he displayed his Navy medals. He pointed out that they were incorrectly arranged, suggesting it was a reflection of Kelly’s disregard for military discipline. Notably, Hegseth is a former Army major, adding some weight to his critique.

The Pentagon is investigating Kelly for possible violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which mandates that military members obey lawful orders. If found guilty, he could face serious consequences, including a court-martial or being recalled to duty.

In a post on social media, Kelly defended his actions, stating that the Pentagon’s investigation was merely an attempt to intimidate Congress members. He emphasized that laws allow individuals to reject illegal orders. The video, which sparked this uproar, was shared to encourage military and intelligence members to stand up for the Constitution.

Interestingly, the military context adds another layer to this discussion. Under Trump’s administration, there were more than 20 airstrikes targeting drug smugglers in the Caribbean and Pacific Ocean. Many questioned the legality of these strikes, raising concerns about the military’s actions without congressional approval.

A group of Democratic senators, including Kelly and Slotkin, have pushed for transparency regarding these airstrikes. They asked the Department of Justice to release its legal opinion on the strikes to ensure the legality of using lethal force.

In a democracy, the use of force is a matter that should be carefully scrutinized. As Senator Tim Kaine pointed out, the responsibility of making such decisions impacts not just military members but all citizens. The ongoing controversy serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between military duty and constitutional rights.

For further insights, you can look into discussions on military law and congressional oversight, as historical contexts often shape today’s conversations about governance.



Source link

Breaking News: Politics,Politics,Pete Hegseth,United States,Donald J. Trump,Donald Trump,Michigan,business news