The concept of a carbon budget is straightforward: we have a limited amount of CO₂ we can release before facing serious consequences. What’s alarming is how fast we’re depleting this budget. Every time we drive a car or clear a forest, more carbon dioxide enters the atmosphere. The numbers are staggering. Every second, approximately 1.3 million kilograms of CO₂ are released.
To put that in perspective, a fully grown tree takes 25 to 30 years to absorb about 800 to 1,000 kg of CO₂. This means we’re effectively cutting down around 1,350 to 1,500 trees every second. In just one day, nearly 100 million tonnes of CO₂ are added to our atmosphere. This relentless cycle is ongoing, with no pause in sight.
These figures reveal a harsh reality: we are racing against time. If we keep increasing emissions, the global climate crisis will impact us sooner than we think. It won’t be our grandchildren facing this disaster; it’s here now.
Surprisingly, many nations and corporations are setting net-zero targets for 2050 or later, which seems far away compared to the urgency of our situation. They often set these targets without truly limiting consumption. This raises a crucial question: why is there such a gap between what science advises and what actions are taken? Why is urgency lacking when the data is so compelling?
In this distracting world, awareness is critical. That’s where the Climate Clock comes in. Unlike regular clocks that count upward, the Climate Clock counts down. It shows how much time remains before we exceed critical global warming thresholds, like 1.5°C. When people first see it, they often think it’s broken because it goes backward. But once they grasp its meaning, it stirs deep contemplation.
The Climate Clock is not just a tool; it’s a visual reminder of our countdown to potential disaster. The most famous one is in New York’s Union Square, with its bright red digits ticking away the time we have left to act. Similar clocks are now in cities like Berlin, Seoul, and Rome, serving as public wake-up calls about the climate crisis happening now.
The Energy Swaraj Foundation has even installed over 1,000 Climate Clocks across India in schools, offices, and public spaces. These clocks serve as symbols that remind us daily of our dwindling time and prompt discussions on climate action.
Whenever I stand near one of these clocks, I say to people, “This is not just a countdown to 1.5°C; it’s a countdown to your children’s future.” The Climate Clock brings an uncomfortable truth to light: we have plenty of ideas and technology, but we are running out of time. So, every time you pass a Climate Clock, ask yourself: what am I doing with my remaining time?
Current carbon emissions suggest that without significant reduction efforts, we could surpass a 2°C increase within a few decades—so long as emissions stay constant. However, since emissions are rising, that timeline becomes even shorter. So why isn’t the world acting more urgently? Why are we still waiting?
Tough decisions like reducing fossil fuel subsidies and limiting emissions are often avoided because they can be politically risky. So, instead of facing immediate action, we set distant deadlines while emissions continue to rise. When I ask audiences about when we should tackle climate change, they confidently say “Now.” But when I jokingly suggest delays, the audience laughs because they recognize the truth in it. We tend to put climate action on the backburner, prioritizing exams, budgets, and celebrations instead.
This denial of urgency is alarming, especially among leaders who seem to believe we have more time than we do. There is no restlessness in many eyes, but mine grow increasingly anxious every day. Why are we still debating while the clock ticks down?
Sometimes I wonder if we should pause everything—schools, offices, and factories—just to recognize that climate change is an immediate crisis. Delaying further could mean that opportunities for meaningful action slip away. “Delay is the deadliest form of denial,” a powerful saying that captures our reality well. The crisis isn’t on the horizon; it’s already here. With every moment of inaction, we approach irreversible damage.
We don’t need another report or meeting; we need action—urgency and courage. The pressing question isn’t when to start. It’s whether we will act before it’s too late or continue on this path of denial. The world has solutions; what it lacks is the will to implement them. Our carbon budget is not infinite, and time is not a luxury we have. Every second matters.
Source link
Books and Ideas, Climate Change 2100: Survive or Thrive?, Climate Change 2100: Survive or Thrive? chetan singh solanki, chetan singh solanki Climate Change 2100: Survive or Thrive?, climate change, climate activisim, chetan singh solanki, climate swaraj yatra
