I’m returning H.R. 504, the Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act, without my approval.
This bill focuses on a spot in the Everglades National Park called the “Osceola Camp.” In 1998, Congress passed the Miccosukee Reserved Area Act, which allowed the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida to occupy a certain area within the park, but not the Osceola Camp. The Tribe has a community there with infrastructure for wastewater treatment and water supply, but they often face flooding issues. H.R. 504 would require the Secretary of the Interior to work with the Tribe to find ways to protect the Osceola Camp from flooding.
The Osceola Camp was built in 1935 without authorization in a low area, using fill material. Originally a family home and gift shop, it later became a site for airboat rides. Importantly, none of the current buildings are over 50 years old, meaning they don’t qualify for the National Register of Historic Places.
Previous plans to protect and replace the camp’s infrastructure could amount to $14 million. The Tribe has been asking for federal funding despite holding views against certain immigration policies that many Americans supported during my election.
My Administration believes in safeguarding taxpayer money and is focused on removing violent criminal illegal immigrants from the country. It’s crucial to stop funding projects that don’t align with these priorities. We shouldn’t be responsible for fixing issues in an area without official authorization for occupation.
Based on these points, I cannot support the Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act. Therefore, I am returning H.R. 504 to the House of Representatives without approval.
— DONALD J. TRUMP
December 29, 2025
In a broader context, land use and indigenous rights continue to be contentious issues in the U.S. History shows that many tribal communities have faced significant challenges regarding land ownership and federal acknowledgment. Studies indicate that nearly 80% of tribes face similar struggles with land claims, which often leads to tensions over resource management.
Social media discussions reveal mixed opinions on the decisions surrounding tribal lands. Some advocates emphasize the importance of respecting indigenous practices and rights, while others argue for fiscal responsibility when it comes to government spending. The debate surrounding H.R. 504 reflects a larger trend in how communities seek to address historical injustices while navigating modern political landscapes.
For further details on the implications of this act and its historical context, you can read more about it on [Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov).
