The human brain and computers process information differently. For years, people have compared the brain to software, suggesting that it operates like a machine. However, a recent study challenges this view. The researchers argue that our understanding of consciousness is often flawed because it relies on outdated metaphors.
The study, published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, emphasizes that in biological systems, physical processes drive computation. In the brain, factors like physics, energy use, and real-time changes shape how we think. This suggests that consciousness stems from the physical material performing the computations, not just from running certain code.
Two Schools of Thought
There are generally two main theories about consciousness. The first, called computational functionalism, says consciousness depends solely on how information is processed. Essentially, if a machine processes information correctly, it could be considered conscious, no matter its physical makeup.
The second theory, biological naturalism, ties consciousness to the unique properties of living brains. In this view, the brain’s physical substance is crucial for producing conscious thought.
Both approaches have their merits, but neither fully explains consciousness. This ongoing debate points out gaps in our current understanding.
A Fresh Perspective
The researchers propose a new idea called biological computationalism. This concept doesn’t reject the notion of computational functionalism but instead critiques its limited scope. In traditional computing, algorithms can run similarly on various machines. In contrast, the brain’s operation blurs the lines between software and hardware. The structure of our neural tissue significantly influences how we think.
To illustrate this, the researchers highlight three main features of biological computation:
Complex Processes: Neurons create electrical signals, while synapses release chemical messengers. These activities occur in a constantly changing physical environment, influencing every thought and reaction.
Interconnected Levels: Unlike computers, where software and hardware are distinct, the brain’s activities are deeply intertwined. Changes in one part affect others, demonstrating no strict separation in functions.
Energy Constraints: The brain’s ability to process information is limited by the energy it has. These limitations affect how we learn and remember, showing that energy efficiency plays a key role in brain function.
Rethinking Consciousness
These insights support the idea that in biological systems, the physical structure is integral to computation. If consciousness relies on these biological functions, creating conscious machines could involve more than advanced algorithms or technology upgrades.
Most current AI systems connect inputs to outputs, but they operate on digital processes different from how the brain works. While brains calculate using real physical time, AI relies on predetermined algorithms, missing the dynamic interactions that occur in biological systems.
The researchers don’t claim that AI cannot achieve consciousness, nor do they say only carbon-based life forms can be conscious. Their study is theoretical and lacks experimental tests, leaving many questions open. However, they aim to shift the conversation about consciousness toward its physical foundations.
This exploration into consciousness adds depth to our understanding of both human and artificial intelligence. As we continue to develop technology, recognizing the unique nature of biological computation may unlock new avenues for creating truly intelligent machines.
For more about this research, you can check the original paper here.
Source link
artificial intelligence,biocomputing,biology,brain,computing,consciousness,human brain
