Numerous celebrities, NGOs, and Palestinian medical professionals recently signed a letter accusing Israel of intentionally targeting medical facilities in Gaza and the West Bank. This letter claims Israel has created conditions that threaten the existence of Palestinians in Gaza, echoing language from the Genocide Convention. It also asserts that civilians and medical staff have been deliberately attacked, accusations that Israel has firmly denied.
The letter is set to be presented to lawmakers in the UK and EU. It highlights that for over two decades, Israel has undermined Gaza’s healthcare system. Despite the recent ceasefire, the letter asserts that Israeli forces continue daily attacks and block essential medical supplies from reaching Gaza.
Notably, the letter does not mention the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023, a significant event that led to a surge in violence and disruption in the region. Israel has argued that its military actions are necessary to prevent terrorist activities, as some groups operate from densely populated areas, including hospitals.
In March 2024, Israel imposed a complete ban on humanitarian aid, claiming there was enough support already available. This move was met with international criticism after distressing images of malnourished children surfaced. Eventually, Israel reversed its decision amid public outcry.
The letter, signed by prominent organizations like B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights – Israel, as well as international entities such as Human Rights Watch and Oxfam, demands the restoration of movement between Gaza and the West Bank, unrestricted humanitarian access, and accountability for crimes committed.
The conflict, which escalated dramatically on October 7, 2023, resulted in significant loss of life and complex hostage situations. Following a US-brokered ceasefire in October 2025, discussions aimed at a broader peace plan became stalled. This situation underscores ongoing debates around international humanitarian law and the rights of civilians in conflict zones.
Additionally, social media reactions to this letter have ranged from support to criticism, reflecting deeply entrenched opinions on both sides of the conflict. This highlights how global perceptions and local realities continue to intersect, shaping public discourse on humanitarian issues in the region.
For further reading on international relations and humanitarian law, you can explore resources from trusted institutions like the United Nations or Human Rights Watch.
