Food insecurity is a growing issue in Connecticut. Recent data shows that 14.3% of residents lack sufficient access to nutritious food, making it the highest rate in New England. With federal food program cuts looming, this situation may worsen. A report from the Commission on Women, Children, Seniors, Equity & Opportunity highlights significant losses; over $180 million in federal assistance could vanish in the next few years.
Some specific program cuts include:
- The end of the SNAP-ED program, which taught healthy cooking and active living to recipients.
- Increased costs for administering SNAP, starting in fiscal year 2027.
- Stricter rules for the SNAP-LIHEAP program that helps households with food and heating costs.
- The discontinuation of bonus food supplies from the federal Emergency Food Assistance Program.
- The cancellation of programs that support local food purchases for food banks and schools.
Looking ahead, Connecticut could see an additional loss of $133 million in 2028. This is due to a projected increase in the state’s costs if mistakes in calculating SNAP benefits remain the same. The overall expected decrease in federal food funding could total over $243 million by fiscal year 2028.
Inflation isn’t helping either. In 2025, grocery prices went up by 3%, further straining families’ budgets. In response, the report recommends establishing a special fund to support food and nutrition programs statewide, similar to existing funds for tourism and transportation.
To fund this initiative, the report suggests several ideas, like taxing unhealthy foods and beverages, expanding existing sales taxes, and introducing new taxes on sugary drinks. Connecticut currently spends about $14.81 per person on food programs, which is significantly less than Vermont and Massachusetts, which spend $28.53 and $35.03 per person, respectively.
Rep. Gary Turco, D-Newington, expressed frustration over Connecticut’s low spending on food security. He argued that food should receive similar importance as transportation, which has dedicated funding streams. Improving food education is another crucial area of focus. The report recommends establishing a state-level method to collect reliable food insecurity data, as current methods vary widely.
Christian Duborg from CWCSEO highlighted that many essential data points are missing or outdated. Having accurate information is vital for creating effective solutions. Other recommendations include better food labeling and comprehensive food education in schools.
While advocating for food education, Duborg emphasized the need for real assistance with food benefits. Rep. Jaime Foster, D-East Windsor, suggested using part of a $500 million reserve to bolster programs affected by federal cuts. The current situation reflects a broader trend; recent disruptions in food programs have left many families hesitant to apply for help, fearing more cuts ahead.
Jacob Jakubowski of Connecticut Foodshare described the food situation as dire. The recent government shutdown demonstrated how fragile food security can be. He pointed out that last year’s interruption of SNAP benefits caused lasting damage to the support system.
Sen. Matthew Lesser, D-Cromwell, raised concerns about increasing pressures on food providers as federal assistance wanes. He referenced a previous state-operated food security program that has since been abandoned, stressing the importance of creative solutions during a time of federal uncertainty.
Duborg candidly acknowledged the challenges ahead. He stated that while no single solution will fix the problem, neglecting it only worsens the crisis. As families face more difficulties and state costs rise, investing in food security can enhance residents’ lives and strengthen Connecticut’s future.
Connecticut must prioritize food security, not only to help its residents but also to create a more sustainable and healthier community overall. The road ahead might be tough, but proactive measures could change the narrative.
Source link
feature story,top story
