The U.S. Treasury Secretary recently made headlines by questioning the European Union’s ability to swiftly respond to former President Trump’s proposed tariffs linked to Greenland. Scott Bessent pointed out that the EU, made up of 27 member nations, often struggles with rapid decision-making. He predicted that instead of a strong response, they would default to forming a “working group,” which isn’t exactly known for speedy action.
Trump’s threat to impose a 10% tariff has put the transatlantic relationship under strain, raising fears of a potential trade war. Bessent implied that Washington isn’t particularly worried about the EU’s most powerful economic tool: the ability to restrict access to the single market for U.S. companies.
On social media, Trump hailed a recent phone call with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, calling it “very good.” He emphasized the importance of Greenland for national security, stating, “There can be no going back.” His remarks about convening a meeting at the World Economic Forum reflect a sense of urgency around this issue.
Market reactions have been notable. Recently, the dollar dipped, while gold prices soared above $4,700 per ounce—the highest ever. Treasury bond yields have also climbed, suggesting rising concerns about economic stability.
Bessent highlighted Europe’s ongoing purchases of Russian fuel, noting that their response to economic challenges is often slow. The EU plans to eliminate such imports by the end of 2027, a move that illustrates the challenges of unified action in times of crisis.
Earlier, the Treasury Secretary advised the EU against retaliating against Trump. The bloc is considering tariffs on nearly €93 billion worth of U.S. exports, but it appears they may wait before utilizing their most compelling trade tools.
Historical context adds depth to this situation. In past trade disputes, the countries with a surplus often found themselves on the losing end. Bessent, an economic history professor at Yale, noted this pattern, warning that conflicts could backfire for both sides.
Investors are already responding to this uncertainty. Some, like the bond group Pimco, have started to diversify away from U.S. assets due to the unpredictable policy landscape. Yet, Bessent pointed out that U.S. Treasuries performed well in the previous year, suggesting that not all market participants are panicking.
As European leaders continue to debate how to address Trump’s tariffs, Bessent believes that a negotiated solution remains a possibility. However, he emphasized that it will take time and careful consideration to navigate these complex issues without escalating tensions further.
Source link
