Which animals came first: sponges or comb jellies? For over a century, most scientists believed sponges were the earliest animals. They are simple, lacking muscles and nerves, making them seem like a logical starting point for the animal tree of life. However, in 2008, a genomic study revealed that comb jellies, with their complex features, might actually be the first.
This finding sparked intense debate. Researchers like Nicole King, an evolutionary biologist at UC Berkeley, note that discussions turned combative. She co-authored a paper supporting the sponge theory but later retracted it due to identified flaws. King now advocates for collaboration among opposing sides, suggesting that pooling ideas could reveal more about animal evolution.
Experts like Leonid Moroz from the University of Florida share this sentiment, emphasizing the need for fresh perspectives. Multicellularity emerged around 600 million years ago, leading to diverse animal forms. Within a short evolutionary time frame, five major animal groups appeared: sponges, comb jellies, placozoa, cnidarians, and bilaterians, the ancestors of contemporary vertebrates and invertebrates.
Fossil evidence for these early animals is scarce, complicating our understanding of their evolution. Max Telford, an evolutionary biologist, points out that knowing the first lineage can provide clues about what these creatures looked like. The long-held belief in the sponge lineage saw its foundation shaken when genomic advancements revealed surprising results.
The early 2000s saw a revolution in DNA sequencing, leading researchers like Casey Dunn at Yale to construct an animal family tree using genomic data. Their 2008 conclusion—that comb jellies were the first animals—challenged long-standing assumptions. Responses varied widely, with some embracing this new insight while others clung to traditional views.
The ongoing debate has led to countless studies, some reinforcing the comb jelly hypothesis while others support sponges. This “ping-pong” of opinions often results in media hype, depicting each new claim as the final word on the subject. The crux of the matter is complex: if comb jellies are indeed the root of the animal tree, it raises questions about how traits like muscles and nerves evolved, possibly suggesting that such features arose independently.
Interestingly, the divide in opinions often correlates with researchers’ backgrounds. Those favoring sponges often come from zoology, believing in a gradual buildup of complexity. In contrast, genomics-trained scientists see a possibility for complexity evolving multiple times.
As scientists delve into this age-old question, they are faced with the challenge of tracing genetic signals from nearly 600 million years ago. Recent studies reveal that decisions about which non-animals to include in analyses can significantly influence conclusions. The complexity of this research mirrors the difficulties astrophysicists face when studying the universe’s early history.
In a nutshell, the debate over whether sponges or comb jellies come first remains unresolved. As Daniel Rokas, an evolutionary geneticist, puts it, the puzzle is tough, but there’s a collective wish to find a more definitive answer. This topic highlights not just our quest to know our origins but also the diverse paths that scientific inquiry can take.
For more on the ongoing debate and the latest findings in evolutionary biology, check out this Nature article.
Source link
Animal behaviour,Evolution,Genetics,Science,Humanities and Social Sciences,multidisciplinary
