As more Americans turn to online labs for tests and genetic screenings, privacy concerns are growing. Experts warn that sensitive health information might end up in the hands of insurance companies, lenders, or employers.
Typically, patient data is protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). However, this law mainly covers traditional healthcare providers, leaving many online testing startups outside its reach. These companies often market directly to consumers and aren’t considered medical providers under HIPAA.
Anna Wexler, a medical ethics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, highlights a major risk. “While these tests seem like medical assessments, they might not be protected by HIPAA,” she explains. “These companies operate outside the usual medical environment.”
The shift towards direct-to-consumer health tests is fueled by a desire to catch potential issues early, like cancer or Alzheimer’s disease. Yet, experts warn that banks and insurers might leverage this information to assess risks, affecting loans and insurance options. If you refuse to share your data, you might find it hard to secure a policy or a loan, according to Mark Rothstein, director of bioethics at UC Irvine.
Take Function Health, for example. This startup offers numerous tests for a yearly fee but states it is “not a laboratory or medical provider.” They clarify that they don’t provide medical advice or treatment, which marks a significant gap in privacy protections.
Wexler emphasizes the risk of employment discrimination. Employers could potentially access health data to make hiring decisions, using information from background checks, like genetic tests and scans.
Companies like Function Health and others, such as Prenuvo and Hims, mention in their privacy policies that they may share health information with law enforcement if legally required. For now, there haven’t been many cases of such data leading to discrimination, but experts warn the situation is evolving.
While current laws restrict basic health plans from increasing premiums based on medical history, this doesn’t apply to life or disability insurance. Companies in those sectors can use health information during underwriting. “This influx of new health data could change how insurers evaluate risks,” says Scott Leavitt from Gem State Financial Group.
In recent years, Congressional actions aimed at modifying the Affordable Care Act have the potential to weaken health privacy laws. In response, the American Academy of Actuaries indicates life insurance companies may soon have access to non-traditional health data, which raises concerns about privacy.
Another layer of complexity comes from newer, integrated risk reports that combine genetic and regular health data. Sara Geoghegan, a privacy advocate, states, “We live in a changing landscape for health privacy. The rollback of protections for specific health data underscores this issue.”
As a result of these developments, experts recommend that consumers weigh the benefits against potential risks before ordering tests. Tyler Stokes, a genetic counselor, informs patients that insurance plans could use genetic tests to determine eligibility. Carolyn Applegate from Johns Hopkins urges individuals to consider whether they could face challenges getting insurance based on test results.
In conclusion, as the landscape of health testing continues to evolve, staying informed and cautious about how your data is shared is more important than ever. Understanding the potential implications for privacy can help you navigate this new terrain effectively.
Source link
diagnostics,health tech,patients
