Fossil fuel companies might soon be asked to help cover the costs of climate-related damage. This change is part of ongoing discussions at the United Nations, where a new international tax framework is being negotiated. The talks focus on creating global rules to tackle tax avoidance and improve funding for developing countries.
Many nations support stricter international tax regulations. These rules aim to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for the climate damage their activities cause. However, some developing countries worry that the current draft lacks clarity and strength.
In recent negotiations, proposals that directly connect fossil fuel profits to compensation for climate damage have been weakened. Plans for a global registry to track the wealth of the ultra-rich have also been removed from the text.
Marlene Nembhard Parker, Jamaica’s chief delegate, stressed the urgent need for stronger provisions. She noted that recent climate disasters, like Hurricane Melissa, have had devastating impacts, costing Jamaica nearly 40% of its GDP in one hit. She believes that clearer commitments on environmental taxation are crucial for vulnerable nations to rebuild without accumulating debt.
This convention, initially proposed by African countries in 2022, could potentially be adopted by the end of next year if participating states can resolve their differences. Supporters argue that it could change global tax governance, giving all countries a voice—a departure from existing systems dominated by wealthier nations.
However, progress is slow. The United States has pulled out of the negotiations, and some rich countries prefer to keep discussions on international tax matters within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which mostly includes developed nations.
According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, about 66% of people worldwide believe that wealthy countries have a responsibility to aid poorer nations in dealing with climate change. This sentiment highlights the growing awareness of global inequality in climate impacts and financial burden.
As discussions continue, many eyes are on how these proposed changes will affect both climate action and economic justice on a global scale. The outcome could define our approach to environmental challenges and wealth distribution for years to come.
Source link
fossil fuel,United Nations,Climate Change,global warming,carbon emissions
