The Hazel Johnson Cumulative Impacts Ordinance aims to protect predominantly Black and brown communities from industrial pollution. Named after an environmental activist, it seeks to impose stricter regulations on companies in industrial zones, specifically where harmful pollutants threaten health and safety.
This ordinance would affect neighborhoods along the South Branch of the Chicago River, like Little Village and Pilsen, by requiring companies to consider how their activities impact local residents. The goal is to create safer environments for communities long plagued by pollution.
Recent discussions around the ordinance have highlighted how important it is for residents to voice their concerns. John Cruz Barcenas, deputy chief of staff for Ald. Rossana Rodriguez Sanchez, emphasized that community support is crucial for its success. Although the ordinance was introduced in April, it has faced challenges, including the impact of recent city budget discussions.
Originally, the ordinance followed an investigation by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) into environmental racism in Chicago. In 2018, local activists filed a complaint against the city after learning that a scrap metal company planned to relocate to a community already struggling with pollution. Groups like the Southeast Environmental Task Force rallied to challenge the permitting process, which they argued lacked transparency and community input.
After years of advocacy, the city and HUD reached an agreement that highlighted the need for new environmental justice measures. However, changes in federal administration have raised concerns about the future of such initiatives.
Community members like Tanisha Rae from McKinley Park share personal experiences with pollution. After buying her home, she noticed strong odors from a nearby asphalt plant, affecting her quality of life. These stories underscore the urgency of the ordinance as residents grapple with both environmental and health challenges.
Despite some support, there is skepticism about whether the ordinance goes far enough. Critics, including Theresa McNamara from the Southwest Environmental Alliance, argue that it doesn’t adequately address existing polluters and might prioritize the interests of city-funded organizations over community needs.
As discussions continue, many see this ordinance as just the start of a more significant movement for environmental justice in Chicago. The goal is clear: to ensure that industrial growth does not come at the expense of community health and safety.
For deeper insights into the impacts of environmental justice measures, you can refer to this HUD resource which outlines the frameworks for protecting communities.
Source link
urban nature connection, indoor plants air quality benefits, environmental education and climate action, global warming impact on sports, climate change and winter olympics
