The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently repealed a crucial 2009 finding that stated greenhouse gases harm human health. This repeal has raised serious concerns among environmental advocates, particularly in Wisconsin. They argue this move could negatively affect families and overall quality of life in the state.
This change was announced by former President Donald Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. Trump claimed that the original finding had hurt the American auto industry, raising prices for consumers. He has often dismissed climate change as a myth, ignoring years of scientific research.
Scientists overwhelmingly agree that human activities, particularly the emissions from vehicles and the burning of fossil fuels, contribute significantly to climate change. A recent survey confirmed that over 99% of climate experts support this view.
Advocates in Wisconsin point out that we’re already seeing the effects of climate change with increased flooding, heatwaves, and wildfire smoke. Abby Novinska-Lois, director of Healthy Climate Wisconsin, emphasized that the endangerment finding, which acknowledged the health risks from greenhouse gases, was essential for protecting public health. Without it, she fears for residents’ well-being.
This endangerment finding, established under Obama, identified six major greenhouse gases—like carbon dioxide and methane—as harmful to air quality. The EPA had relied on this finding to regulate emissions from cars and power plants. It survived challenges from industry groups, but the recent repeal signals a drastic shift in environmental policy.
The repeal of this finding means fewer regulations on greenhouse gas emissions. It’s viewed as a step backward in the fight against climate change. Brian Lynk, a senior attorney for the Environmental Law & Policy Center, says this move undermines years of scientific data confirming the dangers of greenhouse gases.
According to the Environmental Defense Fund, looser emission rules could result in an additional 18 billion tons of pollution by 2055. This rise could lead to tens of thousands of premature deaths and millions more asthma cases, especially concerning for residents of Wisconsin and the Midwest, where climate impacts are already evident.
Health issues tied to air pollution, such as preterm births and various cancers, could cost Wisconsin over $5 billion through 2055 due to relaxed vehicle standards. Experts believe businesses will still focus on long-term goals and not rush to produce cars without emission limits.
The administration’s ultimate goal may be to challenge past Supreme Court decisions that affirm the EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases. Environmental groups are preparing to take legal action against the EPA’s repeal, signaling that this issue will continue to spark debate.
The conversation about climate change and health is only gaining traction, with many advocating for stronger protections. As public awareness of this issue grows, so does the urgency for action to combat environmental challenges.
Source link
Green,Living,\u0026,Environmental,Issues,Climate,Change,\u0026,Global,Warming,Politics,Government,Executive,Branch,Public,Health,Wisconsin,Lee,Zeldin,Supreme,Court,of,the,United,States,Donald,Trump,Environmental,Defense,Fund,Barack,Obama,Overall,Negative,WI,Content,Sharing,Green Living \u0026 Environmental Issues,Climate Change \u0026 Global Warming,Politics,Government,Executive Branch,Public Health,Wisconsin,Lee Zeldin,Supreme Court of the United States,Donald Trump,Environmental Defense Fund,Barack Obama,Overall Negative,WI Content Sharing
