The Trump administration took a big step back in fighting climate change by revoking a key scientific finding that declared greenhouse gases harmful to public health. This move, led by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), scrapped a 2009 ruling that identified carbon dioxide and other emissions as threats. This ruling formed the backbone of most climate regulations under the Clean Air Act, affecting cars, trucks, and power plants.
Experts warn that this repeal could eliminate all greenhouse gas standards for vehicles and open the door for broader rollbacks on regulations for power plants and oil and gas facilities. Legal experts predict that this action will likely face significant challenges in court.
Former President Trump described this reversal as “the single largest deregulatory action in American history.” He criticized the original finding as a “scam,” arguing that fossil fuels have helped people over the years. However, scientists worldwide maintain that these emissions contribute to climate issues like heatwaves and severe storms.
Environmental groups strongly opposed the rollback, claiming it represents a monumental attack on federal authority to combat climate change. They argue that the evidence supporting the original finding has only intensified over the past 17 years. Fred Krupp from the Environmental Defense Fund voiced concerns, stating that more pollution will harm health, property values, and water supply for Americans.
Additionally, the EPA is also proposing to delay Biden-era emissions rules for vehicles and end incentives for eco-friendly technologies like automatic start-stop systems. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin criticized previous administrations for what he termed “federal overreach.”
Historically, the Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that greenhouse gases fall under the Clean Air Act’s definition of air pollutants. Since then, the courts have consistently upheld the endangerment finding, reinforcing its importance in the effort to address climate change impacts like flooding and wildfires.
Gina McCarthy, a former EPA administrator, condemned the Trump administration’s actions as reckless. She highlighted the potential for more pollution and its dire consequences on public health, particularly for vulnerable populations like children and the elderly.
Dr. Lisa Patel, a paediatrician and climate advocate, stressed the health risks of this rollback. She warned that as a result, more children would face asthma attacks and more serious health issues could arise within communities.
The response on social media reflects a mix of concern and anger toward the administration’s decisions. Many users expressed frustration over prioritizing the fossil fuel industry over public welfare.
In conclusion, the undoing of the endangerment finding is more than a regulatory change; it could significantly impact climate action and public health in the years to come. The ongoing debate around climate legislation highlights the tension between economic interests and environmental sustainability, a conversation that shows no signs of slowing down.
For additional insights on the legal ramifications of this decision, check out this report from the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Source link
climate-change,donald-trump,us-politics,environment,north-america
